Christophe wrote:I have doubts about the reliability of the Dacia ... it remains a "discounted" Renault ... therefore the costs are planed at all levels, including that of reliability (including the chassis because the engines are, I think, identical to those of the "real" Renault ...)
Attention, do not confuse reliability and low end. The lack of reliability is in the VAG group, they do not give in the low end!
A Dacia takes what is good at Renault (engine / box) and at Nissan (transmission on Duster 4x4), but as the cars are simpler, there are not all the devices that are regularly down at Renault. Here in Switzerland there is a lot of Dacia, I know a lot of people who have and I can guarantee that reliability is at the rendezvous, cars reach (and exceed) 300000 km with a very low maintenance cost .
By cons, there is no fuss, everything is done with a fair cost, for example the seat is very short, so a seat cheaper, but not bad quality so far. Everything is designed with this idea of economy, but keeping the reliability at a good level (the guarantees cost a fortune to the manufacturers, and on a low-cost car it is necessary to avoid as much as possible of the returns in guarantee, thus reliable cars in spite of a low prices)
Ahmed wrote:... Dacia enthusiasts are looking for simple functionality and are therefore less likely to change vehicles by fashion effects or by the taste for change.
It's perfectly fair, we do not buy a Dacia to have the impression to exist, there are German for that.
chatelot16 wrote:what is the difference between hemorrhoid and bmw? no difference, it's the assholes that have
Me who thought it was the mark 4 anus that was for the assholes ...
A+
I think you have not quite grasped the meaning of the intervention of F. Mulet