Technical controversy on the deviation of the field of a magnet

[quartz]

If I remember correctly, the first patent of the system dates from the space period,
The astronauts were supposed to have magnetic shoes with fast detachment and consuming little energy,
so it was THE solution.
Now tell you if this will result in extensions to pure lifting in this form, I don't know.
In scrap yards, or in scrap yards, there are lifting electromagnets, which may be using this technology.
For obvious security reasons, it is much better.

But I do not have patent references, so it may be interesting to draw the thing.

A + + +

PS: Your film is well done.

[Padawan]

thank you Quartz,
[url] http://www.flynnresearch.net/technology/PPMT%20Technology.htm
[/ Url]
the students found me this, apparently recent concept ...
I am in the process of remaking my "electro, permanent magnet" with all the optimized parameters we will see or ultimately if it is profitable !!
I will make a great video on youtube of my tests ... it could always interest someone to redo it ... even if it is already seen !?
Good luck to you
padawan

[quartz]

Ha yes I know the Flynn system, you will also come across Hildenbrand,
Both think they can produce over-unit motors.
The patents are there
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDeta ... cale=fr_EP
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDeta ... cale=fr_EP
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDeta ... cale=fr_EP
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDeta ... cale=fr_EP
I worked a lot on the simulations,
it turns out that if you don't exactly respect the iron sections, you go to the wall,
apparently he doesn't talk about it too much in the patent, when that is an essential point.

A + + +

[Padawan]

hat !!
thank you for all these patents .... incidentally recent!
but why then so many people think or have made engines on "powerful" to say to them but, I would like to know if there is feedback from experiences and if we really have any gain (mechanical?, electrical?) .... ???
but i like this concept a lot and i will see with other experiences
if the diverted flow can constitute an interesting current generator
(yield!) but I have doubts !! because even in impulse the absorbed power and useful power will not necessarily be identical!?
but it is a system to work for many applications ... !!!
what was your challenge Quartz?
Thank you Quartz

[quartz]

Good evening everyone,

Well, I'm not sure why these people advertise things and ultimately don't show anything.
What is certain is that the static simulations are very clear,
If you respect the sections it switches very well.
I give you the simulations for indications, N° 1, N° 2, N° 3
Respectively you can see a simulation with magnet, but without current in the coil.
The magnets are grade 40 neodymium,
then version 3A in a coil of 100 turns and without magnets,
and to finish the same current the same coil with the pellets.
ha I forgot air gap of 1 tenth of a millimeter.

And for fun come see leaves et leaves

A + + +

[Padawan]

well ! well !
and the results are? what did you get Are you looking to mount the system as a generator?
interesting..good work!
A+

[quartz]

I'm not going further than dynamic testing,
I made a series of measurements to evaluate the FCEM in switched mode,
As the results were bad, I did not go further on this track.
I worked on a concept of flow switching alternator, using permanent magnets, visible on a page lost.
I'm counting on the help of ferromagnetism to help movement,
FCEM will have much more difficulty opposing the rotation of a minimum size magnetic rotor.
Finally, I hope.
Then still in the context of magnetic flux displacement, I'm studying the MPI concept,
The reference patent is la.
This embodiment gives an unexpected result to the simulation.
The fact remains that the flow does not move easily on the one hand and that when it moves it does not cut the conductors in the right direction.
which causes the conductors to be induced alternately in opposite directions.
Zero induction result.
I am currently developing a more coherent but above all more accessible design, with respect to the means of realization that I have.
The latest designed simulation shows a good relationship from all points of view.
correct deflection current for few turns, perfectly controlled sense of induction.
if this formula doesn't work, i could move on without regrets.

A + + +

[Padawan]

Bravo Quartz!
Thanks to your experiences! I just gave your personal simulation page to the students and see if we can calculate any yield from your ideas (or maybe you have already realized an idea in real life) do you have any idea about the yield after having "bypassed" the FCEM?
is it greater than or equal to the efficiency of a current alternator?
I looked through the patents !!! but nothing in theory and calculation of fields and electric energy .... balance sheet and yields ..... weird that you can patent anything without serious calculations and feedback "... internet everything is not clear !!
Bravo again for your experiences!
good continuation
A ++

[quartz]

Hello everybody

Hello Padawan
No I haven't done a performance evaluation yet,
I don't have a powerful enough simulator to do it via computer,
I have to put together a model, but at the moment I'm overwhelmed by the job.
And then casually I spend more and more time answering questions about my rantings.

Regarding patents in fact it relates to the implementation of means to obtain a result.
that's why it goes the applicants do not spread too much on the real goal they pursue.
They classify a result a little vague and that's it.

I will go back to the models when it is quieter.

A + + +

PS: don't send your students into the wall anyway!

[Padawan]

No comment!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUWMu_Pu4y4

at least we experience something that works and is easy to achieve