Engines Minato 40.000 units sold

[Capt_Maloche]

Well, I'm back from doing my phsyics classes ...
so you're a physics teacher, great!

If there is little work to do, it is because the rotating field is turning in a vacuum, without interaction with another device that could slow it down.

The comparison with a mechanical wheel on perfect bearing seems good. It does not take much energy for it to run without stopping. But as soon as you join her, she slows down.

If your spinning field interacts with something else, it creates induced currents tending to slow down the motor cause, this is called the Lenz's law et it is intrinsically contained in the Maxwell Faraday equation, or the resulting Faraday's law.

From a mechanical point of view, the induced currents act via the Laplace forces and the Joule effect as brakes. When the currents are disordered, it becomes Joule effect only. Mechanical energy is degraded to heat.

So it would be a real revolution.
Rather yes !

Now you can very well get a power converter. There, everything is OK.
Yes, a magnetic reducer, which is not so bad

It must be that I am better immersed in your achievements because they are interesting. I promise you !!
Thank you, thank you .... again

See you soon.

I understand what you are saying about the laws of Lenz and Faraday, I tickled them for a while

In the case of this assembly, the magnetic source (the permanent magnets) remain fixed and the residual magnetic field becomes rotating only because of the screens in movement, I no longer reason only with directed field lines, the screens acting as " shutters "as it would say Quartz

In the order of layer editing:

1) Fixed permanent magnets
2) Self-compensated mobile screens
3) The mobile rotor to be defined in magnetic materials (iron, ferrite ...), but not magnet

There will be, for sure, interrelationship between the rotor and the screens, but limited by the "neutral" nature of the rotor, and it is in the design of the latter that I intend to work.

a bit like squirrel cage rotors, where iron losses, foucault and hysteresis have been very severely limited

PS: you seem convinced that the work of the "screens" will be directly linked to the work recovered by the rotor ... that's the theory, but I admit that it does not seem obvious to me, I do not "visualize" well enough screen / rotor interaction, not yet, I'm looking for the simplest equivalent model, because putting it into an equation is downright "MONSTERY"
It does not seem, but I worked a lot on the first 2 elements of this montage.

[akrapovic73]

news?

[phil53]

Good evening, I just read quickly what you did. I did not understand everything but if you do not find anything in your search for anteriority, it is not a soleau envelope that must be filed but a patent application.
The envelope protects only for exploitation but does not grant any right to assign a license or another to file.
It is also necessary to remove from this heading everything that is the value of the patent.
These public explanations in themselves are a prior art

[Capt_Maloche]

Okay, I do not run after, but who knows, the magnetic reducer is one of the surprises of this amazing subject, but not its purpose; and then, as you say, the forum serves as traceability on the genesis of the system.

for now I put the subject in stand bye, I'm on other very concrete topics published on the forum, but I do not give up the piece, it's the time that is missing and I made the temporary choice to advance on topics that are just as important to me

I know that Quartz bump full pot on it

See you soon

[hic]

Without going into details, I come back to the idea of magnetic coupler with a question probably a little stupid for some: the magnetization would not tend to weaken over time when the magnet is subject to permanent fields?

hi Christophe

You really believe that a TGV will break down magnetization?

*
The technology of "permanent magnet motors" makes it possible to produce more power for less energy consumption than with a traditional motor, argues Alstom.
http://www.latribune.fr/info/Le-TGV-dev ... nsf-$RSS=1
*
For the latest generations of magnets,
the magnetic counter-flux to break a magnet is huge.
Which is a lot!
Today ,
a N52 magnet from 1g produces a 1kg job (to take off)
and 500g at a distance of 0,5 mm
[/ Quote]
If the answer is no, I think further study of the idea may be of interest. If I understood correctly (sorry I really did not follow this "file" bcp) that would allow a coupling with variable transmitted torque?

What about creating a new topic to present your 1er results? Because in the subject magnetic motor is too lost
[/ Quote]
The most common magnet motor is your DVD and DD.
For the 'recovery', it is necessary to convoy the electronic control module
of the motor .

[voitureaeau]

Hybrid a car with water is possible. look: I AM A SALE SPAMMER

[elephant]

Loch Ness Monster, The Return, Xth Edition

[yanyan26]

Hybrid a car with water is possible. look

Warf warf warf

Sorry it's the nerves

[Capt_Maloche]

Hybrid a car with water is possible. look:

OH NO ! CA SUFFIT THE CONNERIES !! 50% savings

of course we can hybridize with water, but not like that

and in addition there is the econology banner at the bottom of the page !! Toff, do you agree ???

Sellers of this type of scam should be jailed

EH! careaueau! what flow produces your gadget? with what intensity?

Do you know that the production yield is lower than 1 with a traditional electrolyser? and that the motor efficiency is 20% to produce current on the alternator? that the efficiency of the alternator is lower than 1? that your overall yield will be 10%?

PFFFF!

Go see this topic instead: https://www.econologie.com/forums/voiture-di ... t5849.html

[Christophe]

and in addition there is the econology banner at the bottom of the page !! Toff, do you agree ???

Not too no, but I can not control everything either ... that is to say that I can not prevent a webmaster to take the headband econology and put it on his site ...

In other words: not much to do ...