Hi Remundo,
As you pointed out the 2nd principle of thermodynamics was born from the simple observation that no known system "produces energy" (do not take it to the 1st degree, it is exhausting) by cooling. But this is only an axiom. And since nature never reads scientific publications, a surprise is always possible. With age you will become less categorical. If you have time, go see a seeker who will show you the way to humility:
http://perso.orange.fr/michel.hubin/index.htm#index
Nothing but its preamble on "the law of Tartempion", deserves the turning ...
Finally to come back to Meyer and approach it with a less critical eye, I give you to meditate on a quote attributed to Thomas Bearden: "If our (electromagnetic) systems are not overunitary, it is because we have done everything to that they cannot become it ".
_________
Hi captain
Dis crispus I personally tried 4 models with AVEC without other results than increasing the consumption of my wife's twingo to 9l / 100
I followed your setbacks and I admit that I did not understand what happened to you, probe problem, leaking injector, too much pressure upstream of the injector (bad calibration of the valve)?
Last question, have you noticed an additional couple? If it is not you can throw your VSLA, it only brings faults.
The Twingo 1 has a piezoelectric vacuum sensor, which allows the computer to estimate the flow from the speed and the throttle position. Of course the vortex disrupts the measurement ... But the calculo ended up adapting over the km, especially since it is the lambda probe that always has the last word ...
You can read again what I put on the AVEC6. I could only make 2 reliable consumption readings after mounting the AVEC, and since my wife never notes its full ...
By cons for my 2 diesel (AVEC4 and 7), I have to save a few quintals of CO2 since 2006 ...
I tested a WITH after the butterfly and one above (tin can), the first gave the best results. The consumption which was never less than 7 l / 100 before assembly (rather 8,5 l / 100) approached 6 to 6,5 after, and yet over courses of a few km. Normal, the torque is present from ~ 1200 rpm, no need to "restart the machine" at each slowdown. The overheating problems ceased when the computer finished learning (~ 100 km). The Twingo has since left home, after 20000 km without a hitch.
I would add that by piercing the candles (memorable debate
), starting in wet weather is easier. No impact on the cons by cons. Ditto for hard drive magnets.
it is actually "down sizing"
come on, prove us wrong
On a 205 gti A "crazy experimenter" compared the answers "WITH and without" using Powerdyn, it's still amazing:
http://vortex.francophone.free.fr/viewsujet.php?id=100
Yes, the ECU sends less fuel than normal, but since it is also programmed to smooth the torque curve, the WITH "jumps" this "software lock", doing more with less fuel. I specify that his flowmeter is before the AVEC, therefore "no cheating" on the measurement. According to f4cvv, "it grows hard!".
Finally, nothing prevents manufacturers from manufacturing movable fins or shape memory, so as to free the passage of gas at high speed. The customer wins 100%, and the "downsizing" argument becomes a pipe dream.
_____
It's time to come back to Meyer & co. Why do we never get the advertised cops? I give you an explanation gleaned from my meetings:
To protect his discovery, it is customary for the inventor to file a patent. But the technological watch of the big boxes is on the lookout, and systematically replicates everything that seems worthy of interest as soon as its publication. See the misadventure of Michel Hubin cited above, which tells how he was blown his discovery by an American firm, in total disregard of the laws. An individual or a laboratory is not big enough to face: he will die in debt before the end of the procedure
So it is customary for the inventor to reserve a capital point of the process, which prevents its optimization. This is called the "industrial secret" which guarantees an advance to the holder in the face of competition, sometimes even when the protection expires. The patent is a recipe, but without the cook's "knack" you can throw away your dish.
However:
1) a non-replicable patent brings the inventor into disrepute, who will be called a charlatan.
2) by silencing or disappearing the inventor, his invention remains unusable.
So yes, not to mention "conspiracy theory", if "we" do not hesitate to bomb civilians for oil, "we" will have no qualms about eliminating a hoarder in circles. The current economy is based on petrodependence, above all nothing should be changed ...
