Bedini machine

[molux]

Hello,

A big thank you to everyone for your nice feedback, it's been a pleasure.
Regarding the questions of "on unit" I try to answer them here:
http://www.syscoil.org/index.php?cmd=nav&cid=8

Regarding the energy production part, you have to analyze the SG schema for example, then read this article by Tom Bearden, I would like to translate it but it takes a lot of time.
http://www.syscoil.org/index.php?cmd=nav&cid=71

Regarding the number of battery, it can work with a single battery which will apparently not discharge, but it is necessary to release the radiant energy in a flash tube for example, if not it is directly in the silicon of the 2N3055 which goes little burn on its heatsink. The advantage of putting 2 batteries is to "visualize" the quantity of radiant energy that you generate.
If with a charged power supply battery, you can recharge the charge battery without debiting the supply battery, you will know how much radiant energy you have scraped.

Voila, I hope I have answered your questions, actually I need help translating the documents to put online, etc ....
and above all mount several replicas to ensure viability

See you soon

Molux

[elephant]

well, I'm going to print it and read it tonight, it will already be here

[molux]

Hello,

I just listed a few suppliers for the enamelled copper wire, the flashing lights (neon), the magnets, etc ... I put it online tonight

PS: Elephant, don't forget to recycle your paper ....

A ++

Molux

[elephant]

fi so, I didn't even print on both sides

[elephant]

well i started reading the 20 pages in english.
I'm only on page 3, it's compact: I fall asleep quickly!

there is food and drink in these first 3 pages.

not very conventional as physical in this speech, it talks about recovering the energy of the vacuum and building up a negative resistance using the accumulator .... I like!
I retain nevertheless (with the filter of my analysis of electronics), before going further than the secret of the contraption consists in charging the self
at the moment when, by reaction (Lorentz law) it should slow down the magnet by a negative resistance, which of course would cancel the effect of attraction of the magnet by the self.

following the next issue!

[molux]

Hello,

Well here it is, I finally found suppliers of magnets and long lengths of enameled copper wire. I published the list on syscoil.org, with around 50 € we can find the main material for the creation of replicas, the rest can be recovered quite easily.

A ++

Molux

[elephant]

what is extremely "disturbing" in the pages which I have already read, is that the author explains that there are several currents in a battery: the current of electrons which passes through it normally during the charge and the current of lead ions which migrates from one plate to another: a mess ensues that I have not yet understood between the moment when we charge and the moment when the ions move all in a beautiful mic mac from "vacuum energy", without the slightest figure, the slightest table, the slightest sketch.

I would not go so far as to pretend that the Bedini machine does not work, but I am not at all convinced by these comments!
In my opinion, it is not that at all!

[molux]

Hello,

Here is a diagram on which you are trying to explain I think, Bearden calls it Battery Poping


Click here to see Bearden's explanation

If it can help you

A ++

Molux

[elephant]

in fact, it's not so much what I'm trying to explain, it's rather what I'm trying to understand

as for the relationship with vacuum energy, I am far from convinced.

[molux]

Hi Elephant,

Cool to find French people who are interested in this process, I hope we will manage to move forward ...

- Can you remind me of what constitutes a black hole already?
- Can you remind me of the level of understanding that we had in 2007?
- Can you convince me that there is no latent energy in the SMOT experience?
- Do you challenge the concept of zero point energy?

In addition, there are several theses on the functioning of the Bedini, each of them does not state, they suggest theories ...
I believe that Bedini advances the thesis of radiant energy, Bearden that of the weight of ions.

I am also very skeptical about the Bedini system, but in this kind of project, you have to accept to learn new things, even if it means crashing and passing for an urluberlu. Here is what pushes me at least to try and see with my own eyes:

- The number of aftershocks
- The literature available since 1970 around these subjects
- The lack of understanding of black bodies even in 2007 by our "great" scientists.
- Tesla's work

There is a lot of confusion about Over Unity, radiant energy, COP> 1, vacuum energy, perpetual movements, etc ...
This is a debate, fundamentally relative:

Is the rotation of the earth on a human scale a perpetual movement?

A ++

Molux