GEGENE or the so-called Holy Grail?

Innovations, ideas or patents for sustainable development. Decrease in energy consumption, reduction of pollution, improvement of yields or processes ... Myths or reality about inventions of the past or the future: the inventions of Tesla, Newman, Perendev, Galey, Bearden, cold fusion ...
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 06/01/13, 22:20

"I'm just saying what's ..."

Oh no, worse: he said that you were bathed in my badge of influence and that of -2Watts.

:D
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6

by Cuicui » 06/01/13, 22:28

Cuicui wrote:I suggest that any intervention containing attacks on people (insults, banter, sarcasm) henceforth deserves only one response: Troll. And we go directly to the continuation. Who agrees ?
I will also add: reproaches (spelling for example), trial of intent, self-justification.
Reserve this topic for those interested in Naudin's experience. Those who like bickering can take the initiative to create a subject "Bickering" on the theme: "I am good, others are bad".
0 x
BobFuck
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 04/10/12, 16:12
x 2

by BobFuck » 06/01/13, 23:00

> Reserve this subject for those interested in Naudin's experience.

Which rules out any contradiction (say mentioning that JLN does anything), I suppose? That's right, it would be practical ...
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6

by Cuicui » 06/01/13, 23:03

BobFuck wrote:> Reserve this subject for those interested in Naudin's experience.
Which rules out any contradiction (say mentioning that JLN does anything), I suppose? That's right, it would be practical ...
I propose to objectively point out errors by avoiding unnecessary and almost insulting expressions, such as "anything", and sarcastic innuendos which are often a trial of intent.
Last edited by Cuicui the 06 / 01 / 13, 23: 10, 1 edited once.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 06/01/13, 23:08

Well, think about it a little, Bob ...

If Tom Cruise wants to advertise $ cientology in an ecumenical church, you better not let the Taliban in. : Cheesy:
Last edited by Obamot the 06 / 01 / 13, 23: 12, 1 edited once.
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6

by Cuicui » 06/01/13, 23:11

Obamot wrote:Well think a little Bob ... If you want to advertise $ cientology in an ecumenical church, you better not let the Taliban in. : Cheesy:
Troll
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 06/01/13, 23:14

Not only should we not criticize, but metaphor would be prohibited! : Mrgreen: : Cheesy:

Ok, I corrected: Bob is not a proselyte $ cientologue (well I don't think so)

: Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7

by elephant » 06/01/13, 23:18

Cuicui said:

I propose to objectively point out errors by avoiding unnecessary expressions and at the limit insulting, such as "anything".


Totally agree.

Limit yourself to pointing out errors, following the news, at a pinch digress, or joking is good, it's courteous.

The purpose of a forum is to inform or inquire, verify, ask for opinions, check assertions

Demolishing the speakers is boring, it dilutes the subject, unless some are paid by the enemy to do it (see subjects "manipulation strategies", etc ...)

I start to believe in these theses : Evil:
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 06/01/13, 23:26

Well, does that make you a hell of an ad now, no, "surunitaires"?

The audience of forum must have exploded: roll:

So I would eventually agree if this applies to all, although I would find that further restrictions due to some abuse of a single free electron would be nonsense. : Mrgreen: (even if he found in you some support without stopping)

Just something that bothers me, who will define what is troll or not troll?

Naudin, Gégyx Cuicui, you, Quartz or someone else from here?
0 x
User avatar
moulino51
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 85
Registration: 27/02/12, 01:50
Location: On land near Reims
x 3

by moulino51 » 06/01/13, 23:46

Obamot wrote:Well, does that make you a hell of an ad now, no, "surunitaires"?

It does not advertise to anyone neither to the “superunitarians” nor to the “unitarians”: evil:
Obamot wrote:The audience of forum must have exploded. Pffff : roll:

Yes certainly, but it will be without me, because I no longer want to read your rantings, and I'm certainly not the only silent reader who is fed up with it.
This post is totally sterile, and your behavior makes me think that there are kicks in the ass that get lost, both of you have no dignity hidden behind your screens like jackals.

I do not greet you


GS
0 x

Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 135 guests