E-cat Andrea Rossi is back!

[Obamot]

[...] when I say it does not matter, it means that it is not with your money that this myth or lie will raise funds or a factory. Those who invest (except to be stupid) take a whole lot of precaution, do audits, forecasts of return on investment, etc ... So, if they are wrong or are wrong, it's their business: or they win or they lose, it's part of the game.

Regarding "violence in society" (since elsewhere we talk about theology ...) does that mean that you admit this type of violence (very very serious when it comes to questions of betrayals made against humans) while you take offense at the violence done to animals? Something must escape me in Janic's reasoning?

RTDC.

[Janic]

obamot hello

Regarding "violence in society" (since elsewhere we talk about theology ...) does that mean that you admit this type of violence (very very serious when it comes to questions of betrayals made against humans) while you take offense at the violence done to animals? Something must escape me in Janic's reasoning?

The freedom of choice which everyone recommends, more or less, is to make these choices precisely and in this case nobody is obliged to adhere to such or such technology. Those who do it, in this materialistic world do it either by membership (I am not talking about spiritual belief) because they believe in the project, or by financial interest. In both cases it is heads or tails, a game of chance. Therefore, since the two situations are freely agreed, I do not see where there would be violence.

[elephant]

Pffff .......

I'm sick of you monopolizing this thread with your "philosophical" arguments.

I don't read it anymore

I don't feed it anymore.

When I have valid proof

- Rossi's hoax or another (Celani, Pons Fleichman memorial, etc ...)

- or how the thing works,

I recreated another subject.

bye

[Exnihiloest]

False assertion: dozens of physicists, more credible than Rossi, also say it

False assertion based on nothing, always the same sites and same foutage of mouth ...

It is not based on nothing, but on hundreds of experiences. Obviously, when we don't understand physics, we see "nothing" where there is matter.
As for "foutage de gueule", for a site like Nature, it is the sign of a complete ignorance of the scientific publication, of which Nature is a world reference.

[Obamot]

Thank you for stopping your cinoche. Fill in your profile before going for "an expert in nuclear physics"

Here there are not masses who adhere to what you tell (in fact you tell what?).

[Exnihiloest]

Thank you for stopping your cinoche. Fill in your profile before going for "an expert in nuclear physics"

Here there are not masses who adhere to what you tell (in fact you tell what?).

The cry of the sheep, reassured by the herd!

But in science, the truth is not decreed by the majority.

[Obamot]

Well, you're no longer a herd of fallacies! As for you and your approach to science >>>

[raymon]

For those who love English and physics a pdf of airbus innovations:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFm ... view?pli=1

[Exnihiloest]

For those who love English and physics a pdf of airbus innovations:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFm ... view?pli=1

Excellent development. I will reread it better tomorrow, there it is a little late.
This paper does not only concern LENR but also general considerations on why science has hardly advanced since the first half of the 20th century.

An extract :
"From a more general point of view, despite its great successes, 20th century physics essentially places (virtual!) Barriers to the possibilities of man. It started with the speed of light which is believed to be the maximum possible speed in our universe, then continued with the principle of uncertainty which says that we cannot know both the position and the quantity movement of a particle, then physicists have abandoned causality (no engineering is possible with such a concept) and so on. Thus, modern physics has installed a sort of dictatorship on humans by telling them, this is impossible, and by prohibiting them from trying things (who would currently work on an engine that would allow speeds greater than that of light? ). We should know from history that this cannot be true. We can even affirm that these physicists, who say that, in a certain way hope that their contemporaries will not succeed in breaking down their barriers, except that one day they will inevitably do so!"

I think exactly the same. Less because of the speed of light than because of quantum mechanics. The Copenhagen school (Bohr) has completely enclosed minds in a single interpretation of the QM, while there are others quite in accordance with the formalism but which they do not affirm the chance of the result of measure ("god does not play dice" said Einstein), so allow us to look further.

[raymon]

So, modern physics has installed a sort of dictatorship over humans by telling them, this is impossible, and forbidding them to try things (who is currently working on an engine that would allow speeds greater than the speed of light? ). We should know from history that this cannot be true. We can even say that these physicists, who say this, in a way hope that their contemporaries will not succeed in breaking down their barriers, except that one day they will inevitably do so! "

thanks for the translation