Ok i pray
What do you simulate as software?
A motor inexhaustible energy ...
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79126
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10974
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Courage to Snapshoot!
Idem.
I invite Snapshoot:
- to understand that everyone wants to help him.
- to reread carefully the positive remarks made to him.
- to consider the arguments used as tangible.
- and above all to take a step back from the feasibility of his project.
I give him a serious lead: he has not answered the questions he judges "embarrassing»(And who did not find an answer) if he did it honestly by considering ONLY the factual," scientific ", pragmatic or rational aspect (which he calls it as he sees fit) he would quickly see some loopholes (which it may or may not fill ...), even if I wish it would do so ideally.
Now, that some people take it for a "white collar" approach and take it from the top, will not change the tangible result (whether this project works or not for that matter). We are a family "inventors", And quite honestly I don't think I was wrong this time (although it happens to me ).
Christophe wrote:Ok i pray
Idem.
I invite Snapshoot:
- to understand that everyone wants to help him.
- to reread carefully the positive remarks made to him.
- to consider the arguments used as tangible.
- and above all to take a step back from the feasibility of his project.
I give him a serious lead: he has not answered the questions he judges "embarrassing»(And who did not find an answer) if he did it honestly by considering ONLY the factual," scientific ", pragmatic or rational aspect (which he calls it as he sees fit) he would quickly see some loopholes (which it may or may not fill ...), even if I wish it would do so ideally.
Now, that some people take it for a "white collar" approach and take it from the top, will not change the tangible result (whether this project works or not for that matter). We are a family "inventors", And quite honestly I don't think I was wrong this time (although it happens to me ).
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
2 / rôoooh, çaa, we still didn't think it would be so easy to get there
2 / and then we too thought that contrary to the fact that Snapshoot claims to have answered "All the questions", he hadn't!
2 / so if we ask him to READ ALL our counter-arguments, it's good for a GOOD reason, 'spa ...
2 / it's good to help him gather his courage 'spa ...
2 / Besides, apart from the fact that we do not want to make him fall the magic formula all raw in the beak [if that is possible ...] Who is it the "applicant" here? It's not "humanity" yet huh: Who is it if not "our" Snapshoot !? Yes, it takes courage!
2 / because indeed "If" Snapshoot had taken the trouble to respond to "All the questions" [if at all possible in terms which are not necessarily favorable in the outcome that HIM wants] and especially to accept the answers and the hypotheses [not necessarily in the sense that HIM would like, but possibly if it 'is relevant ... yes, but only if it is ... etc]. Well, he wouldn't be around with us. He would not need to build certainties with uncertainties (if they are certain or not .... by the way ...)
Ok, anyway, a first track?
- in any "negotiation", the rule of the game is to admit the possibility that there is a "possible negative response": that is part of the rule of the game (whether we like it or not for that matter );
Second track?
- in inventions and technique, as in science, it is kif-kif ...;
- there may be potential failure or potential success, depending on ...
- it's not a lesson, it's a simple observation of things.
Third track?
https://www.econologie.com/forums/les-negati ... 11692.html
Let Snapshoot explore that and we'll talk about it again ...
That he make a small Excel table in "X" and in "y" that he examines every point by point, and that he introduces the for VS the against which he has been opposed, and that he puts in the result what he thought of it. For example by creating for himself a relevance scale from 1 to 10 (in his assertions, as for the counter-arguments) Then he publishes this table here ...
And only then ... we'll talk about it again ...
2 / and then we too thought that contrary to the fact that Snapshoot claims to have answered "All the questions", he hadn't!
2 / so if we ask him to READ ALL our counter-arguments, it's good for a GOOD reason, 'spa ...
2 / it's good to help him gather his courage 'spa ...
2 / Besides, apart from the fact that we do not want to make him fall the magic formula all raw in the beak [if that is possible ...] Who is it the "applicant" here? It's not "humanity" yet huh: Who is it if not "our" Snapshoot !? Yes, it takes courage!
2 / because indeed "If" Snapshoot had taken the trouble to respond to "All the questions" [if at all possible in terms which are not necessarily favorable in the outcome that HIM wants] and especially to accept the answers and the hypotheses [not necessarily in the sense that HIM would like, but possibly if it 'is relevant ... yes, but only if it is ... etc]. Well, he wouldn't be around with us. He would not need to build certainties with uncertainties (if they are certain or not .... by the way ...)
Ok, anyway, a first track?
- in any "negotiation", the rule of the game is to admit the possibility that there is a "possible negative response": that is part of the rule of the game (whether we like it or not for that matter );
Second track?
- in inventions and technique, as in science, it is kif-kif ...;
- there may be potential failure or potential success, depending on ...
- it's not a lesson, it's a simple observation of things.
Third track?
https://www.econologie.com/forums/les-negati ... 11692.html
Let Snapshoot explore that and we'll talk about it again ...
That he make a small Excel table in "X" and in "y" that he examines every point by point, and that he introduces the for VS the against which he has been opposed, and that he puts in the result what he thought of it. For example by creating for himself a relevance scale from 1 to 10 (in his assertions, as for the counter-arguments) Then he publishes this table here ...
And only then ... we'll talk about it again ...
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Hey, hey ... another final spin ?!
Yes, that, the contempt and the challenge that Snapshoot cultivates we understood.
Ok, not that to do we leave him the last word and he closes the door well when leaving.
https://www.econologie.com/forums/les-negati ... 11692.html
Yes, that, the contempt and the challenge that Snapshoot cultivates we understood.
Ok, not that to do we leave him the last word and he closes the door well when leaving.
https://www.econologie.com/forums/les-negati ... 11692.html
Last edited by Obamot the 07 / 06 / 12, 12: 27, 1 edited once.
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 18 Replies
- 8137 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
06/09/22, 00:50A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 730 Replies
- 145732 views
-
Last message by Eric DUPONT
View the latest post
24/11/23, 13:45A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 13 Replies
- 7650 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
20/06/21, 15:14A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 42 Replies
- 30956 views
-
Last message by Lilieth78
View the latest post
20/05/18, 15:32A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
-
- 23 Replies
- 22041 views
-
Last message by Ahmed
View the latest post
27/02/17, 19:56A subject posted in the forum : Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development
Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 65 guests