RealWheel wrote:I don't want to post on this forum because Christophe is not convinced of the possibility of amplifying energy in a machine.
You have to be a little paranoid to believe that this forum prevents someone from posting new ideas, when it is intended for that, as far as I understand! Isn't Christophe trying to stay lucid,
for the rest of us ...RealWheel wrote:Now, I do not hold it against him since we are graduates of the same school and that the Strasbourg teachers are not yet ready to admit the theories that I develop on surunity.
There you go, more syllogism. That is true? You know each other? Same supplier?
RealWheel wrote:In response to my proposal to build some machines, I was kindly sent back to my homes.
And so why not a dedicated site, rather than one that exists and which navigates in troubled waters .... (If ReelWheel has not seen, in its links of pseudo-companies there are some who have not made update for ages ... It's bogus, for me.)
RealWheel wrote:But all of this, again, makes sense.
"Logic" is what ReelWheel lacks when you read its words!
RealWheel wrote:Others than me, with very large degrees in nuclear physics encounter identical difficulties (see the report by Professors Forcardi and Rossi).
And hop, we would still be in the fallacy, definitely ...
Bein Alain G is really nice! What courage and selflessness.
ReelWheel: I've heard this type of discourse for more than forty years (I come from a family of "inventors"), my father always told me that I had to concretize, conceptualize any invention, develop it, put the contact: and ... see at the end ... what didn't work !!!
For machines
"Supernumerary", I do not believe it. Tesla - if lost in the limbo of his brain, his antenna project could / could have worked as he intended at the time - he never did
"than" recovering latent electric charges very present in the environment (which was already very meritorious to have understood that they existed and that one could take advantage of) there was therefore nothing "
supernumerary»In there ... Yes, potentially it is not impossible that someone will one day be able to put it into practice! This is real, since we can see potential differences with an antenna between the top and the bottom of a building: now, are these loads sufficient? They will no doubt become so with electronic devices which consume less and less and thanks to progress in energy efficiency in general ... There, it is quite possible that we are rediscovering Tesla amha.
Because the real question is: what are their real proportions once we have removed other electric fields with reverse charge which would partially or totally cancel them? It is not yet won! So even if these fabulous machines could exist, they would only recover the latent energy of a physical phenomenon already existing in one form or another - or so as Gaston says, it would be necessary to rewrite a theoretical page - As it stands , even from the most optimistic perspective: it wouldn't be "
excess».
So much for logic (but it's exhausting to repeat ...)
