Meyer Plans Lawton recent developments?

Innovations, ideas or patents for sustainable development. Decrease in energy consumption, reduction of pollution, improvement of yields or processes ... Myths or reality about inventions of the past or the future: the inventions of Tesla, Newman, Perendev, Galey, Bearden, cold fusion ...
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 11/06/12, 23:31

If every time Dedeleco crashes we are entitled to its logorhea!

: Shock: to hide his denial, he takes revenge by interposed lies :?


dedeleco wrote:Obamot does not see appalling anti-scientific salads full of inconsistencies !!

He is not even able to know the harmonic 1 and even less the harmonic 10, of a sound, nor to understand the attenuations by superimposed layers, yet used on lenses and cameras too !!!

Fun!

Question asked to you about harmonics to demonstrate your incompetence and reveal your smoking theory of light materials called [phonic insulators] ... (defying mass law!)

The harmonics proving to you by A + B that the propagation was still happening ...

You never knew how to find the answer on the NET, although you searched a whole day to gratify us with your copied / pasted ...!

The demonstration was made: you are null and incompetent, liar and you always seek to fart higher than your bottom!


: Mrgreen: : Cheesy:
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 12/06/12, 00:21

Obamot does not know how to read the quantitative answers that I have indicated, in a lot of very classic links and courses in wave propagation, (wikipedia and others), used to soundproof, with less heavy, with alternating layers, as well as in other fields, with all possible wave types, sound, light, quantum of electrons, neutrons.

Obamot, obstinate in his preconceived ideas, does not read the basic courses and therefore understands crookedly, never makes quantitative assessments, and tells anything.

Obamot is even unable to solve this little elementary problem a little modified, which number is 4 times closer to 100 than to 15?
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 12/06/12, 00:40

Who is "Stubborn" who claims that from the "acoustic correction"Would be pseudo ineffective sound isolation.

Take any of your light materials and put it right through as a curtain in front of your wide open window - block it with a frame that won't let air in - and you'll see if you can't hear the song of the birds, or the bells of the corner church : Mrgreen:

Are you constantly trying to be a jester to pass the time? Speaking of bell, you still haven't understood the nuance of resonance then! hahahahah ....

Desperate, and hilarious even Bidouille and Aérialcastor understood ... them:

Question asked to you about harmonics ...> which totally dismantles your smoking theory of light acoustic correctors allegedly insulating and defying the law of mass!

Harmonics - who pass briskly through, see the example abovel) - prove to you de facto that the method that you like to describe cannot stop the propagation of sounds which is still done in said materials ...

You never knew the answer on the NET, although you looked for more than three days to gratify us with your copied / pasted ... and your lies! And answer with another question ... ...>

Evidence given here ...> with a post never edited which you falsified the wanted meaning!

The demonstration has now been made several times: you are null and incompetent, liar, falsifier and manipulator to hide your faults and you play the real harmful troll by making a nice nose at Remundo and his cordial sense!
: Lol:
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 12/06/12, 02:11

Obamot gets angry, it is very visible in the words he uses, that Obamot does not read the precise texts indicated, on the forum locked on the soundproofing, as a result of a past nervousness of Obamot, still has not understood anything, nor has made correct experiments with alternating layers with very different speed of sounds (with factor more than 10), where, all, there is a huge difference, on well soundproofed doors or on triple glazed glass with thin glass, compared to a simple glass 3 times thicker. (huge difference, to the point that I no longer know if outside there is a storm)

but Raz the bowl it's out of the subject:

Meyer Plans Lawton recent developments?

and I was only indicating errors and salads from certain posts on this subject such as the 21cm line of interstellar neutral H, to be used in Meyer equipment, according to alaniesse, and which does not exist in water.

I think that highlighting the scientifically proven reality in many prestigious studies and published articles is very useful to see clearly in S Meyer, instead of perfectly muddy riddles.

Finally Obamot does not calculate anything of the amplitude of its harmonics, because Obamot is unable to solve this little much more elementary problem a little modified:
which number is 4 times closer to 100 than to 15?
or with the age of jJeanne Clament, what is the age older, 3,48 times closer to her age at 123 years than 20 years !!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 12/06/12, 07:39

Continue to answer the questions with other questions: don't be shy : Mrgreen:

What an unsurpassable fab that persists and signs:

Thread locked for the first time because of you here on March 23:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post227816.html#227816

Week during which you “illustrated” yourself in different ways:
What will give birth to the thread «What to do with dedeleco ???» ...>

Then it does not stop you, the thread is locked permanently, always because of your nonsense, April 2, after you are still "picked up" (so keep your questions for yourself ...):
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post229241.html#229241

Pissed off? You are really pathetic! Aren't you tired of being slapped by everyone here? And never stop playing the service buffoon ...! You should consult ...
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 12/06/12, 09:35

Hello Dedeleco
Cordial understanding is difficult, with those who despise the serious and careful work of hundreds of thousands of scientists.

According to you :
Peter Duesberg, professor of molecular biology
Kari Mullis, researcher, Nobel Prize in chemistry 1993
Dr Eleni Papadopoulos, doctor
Dr Valendar Turner, doctor
David Rasnick, biochemist and protease inhibitor designer
Dr Charles Geshekter, professor of African history
Rebecca Culshaw mathematician, mathematical modeling of the interaction of HIV with the immune system? Author of the book: “The HIV theory of AIDS, scientific inconsistency. "
Etienne de Harven doctor of medicine specializing in electron microscopy. Author of the 10 lies of AIDS
Charles Thomas, professor of molecular biology at Harvard University.
Christian Fiala gynecologist and obstetrician
Celia Farber, journalist and author, victim of AIDS treatment,
etc ...
Are these scientists denied?
And as you like to manipulate the term negationist, here is what Célia Farber says: "Any attempt to rigorously test the medical hypothesis which is favored at the moment is countered, not by a rational debate, but by a rhetoric of moral blackmail:" Peter Dusberg has the blood of African babies on his hands, c is the devil in person. He's a psychopath, he should be in jail "(Doesn't that remind you of someone whose nickname starts with a D ... and another who got fired with a double P?) those who would like to cause the AIDS establishment to debate in a rational manner as is done in most other scientific fields are called deniers, as if a certain skepticism about the pathogenic potential of HIV was equivalent, in terms of morality, to deny that the Nazis slaughtered six million Jews "
Do you remember anything?

Hello plasmanu
Dede is right.
A third of the reference scientists work in the nuclear industry.
A third purely for the interests of the employer.
The last third university.

And an additional third who says the opposite of the three previous conformists!
0 x
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180




by plasmanu » 12/06/12, 09:45

: Mrgreen:
Without forgetting that 3/4 do that to have their name published.
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 12/06/12, 12:48

You totally derail, band of C .... !!

Negarionists of Realities and Sciences, which nevertheless you use with your tablet PC, telephone, TV, car, etc ...

Picol, smoke deeply, eat badly, never do intense exercise, like Obamot, plasmanu, already smothered, and others, and you will live older, inveterate deniers of reality, and believe in the absurdities and inconsistency around S Meyer and other absurdities, never reproduced !!!
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 12/06/12, 13:25

You totally derail, band of C .... !!
Be careful, you risk being fired for insults ... repeated !!!
You did not answer: scientists or not? In addition:
To date, professionals who do not adhere to the official theory are more than 2.800
The list is available on
www.aras.ab.ca/rethinkers.php
0 x
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180




by plasmanu » 12/06/12, 15:05

dedeleco wrote:You totally derail, band of C .... !!

Negarionists of Realities and Sciences, which nevertheless you use with your tablet PC, telephone, TV, car, etc ...

Picol, smoke deeply, eat badly, never do intense exercise, like Obamot, plasmanu, already smothered, and others, and you will live older, inveterate deniers of reality, and believe in the absurdities and inconsistency around S Meyer and other absurdities, never reproduced !!!


: Mrgreen:
My father puts me on my bike: he's a beast.
The apero is for the social.
I eat organic fig quince cherries ... Off topic.
Look for me 1 gram of fat : Mrgreen:

Meyer. It's a dream: of course.
Run an engine only with water.
To dream is not to believe.
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru

Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 109 guests