What a small reactor!

[coucou789456]

Good evening

their assembly, if it is not very effective, has above all the merit of the simplicity of installation. it is quite certain that a large number of people will dare to take the plunge. naturally, the results will certainly not be up to the original product modified by the aesthetes of forum !

but even if the results are not really there, the simplicity of implementation will surely prevail.

it will doping with water vapor, nothing more, and certainly lukewarm!

they announce a saving of 5 to 25% ....

there is apparently a distribution network in place already, even if they do not have convincing economic results, they will make a box for the sale of their product.

I prefer to continue to put SP95 in my tank, the economy is already well verified, and it costs absolutely nothing, no engine modification. (for a saving of about 10% of fuel)

jeff

[Other]

Hello

they announce a saving of 5 to 25% ....

5% we don't talk about it is not measurable
But 25% with such a simple assembly deserves reflection

Personally I have not managed to exceed 34%
and each time I try to consume less water 0 liters per 5km I consume more diesel
my best performances were made with water consumption 0,9 to 1,1 liters of water per 100km and at spring or autumn temperatures, around 20c to 22c.

Andre

[coucou789456]

Good evening

this company is opportunistic and uses the global vacuum concerning the possibilities of easily mounting a Pantone "reactor" on a vehicle ... but in terms of real economy, there are no independent user tests.

in the same kind of idea, too bad that this subject ( https://www.econologie.com/forums/post96244.html#96244 ) have not been continued because this system was quite interesting because obviously not mounted in the exhaust and therefore more easily adaptable!

jeff