Cahors City Hall team in a Diesel 306 water doping

[Christophe]

And here we go again ... I feel that it will disappoint!

So I warn you pb2487.5: this time you will not manage to make us close this subject ... on the other hand you risk the deletion of your "neuneus messages" ... We have experience with you in this domain.

At least you are warned ...

[Macro]

Me, I would throw something well (it's not for breaking the shack I would like to believe in your thing)


Let us ask the town hall of cahors for the memos and letters sent to the various personnel during the period concerned, concerning the use of vehicles and the management of energy expenditure ... As well as the list of possible sanctions promised to abusing users ...

I saw the consequences of this kind of mail on truck parks ... It speaks ...

Another thing ... Knowing the annoying tendency of French employees to believe that a lot of things are due to them by their business ... All you need is a man who carries his 5 liter jerrycan in the trunk and does his bit full every time he fills up with the 306 ... Like the mangy he thinks that it heats him behind ... The 306 it starts to consume much less ....

Once I went to buy a second-hand motorbike from a truck driver who was in the process of retiring ... In the small garage in his lodge he had stored 6000litres of diesel fuel and was 200litres which he had drawn off © of his truck during the previous years ...

These are very common practices in France ...

[Christophe]

... All you need is a man who walks his 5-liter jerry can in the trunk and who fills up every time he fills up with the 306 ... Like the man he thinks he heats up at behind ... The 306 it starts to consume much less ....

Pure and simple defamation ...

[nlc]

The consumption is one thing, can actually vary in a fairly large proportion depending on the way of driving, but there is one fact that should not be forgotten, it is the measurement of pollution. Because it is not only the consumption and the associated CO2 which is important, there are also the other pollutants. And in history, the measurements taken before / after show the spectacular drop in pollution and smoke.

So even if the consumption does not drop, doping is still beneficial! But with just a little logic, we can easily deduce that if there is less smoke and unburnt, it is that there are more burns right !? And if there are more burns for the same route, we need less diesel, right !?

[pb2488]

And here we go again ... I feel that it will disappoint!

He only cares about you. Modares ....

So I warn you pb2487.5: this time you will not manage to make us close this subject ... on the other hand you risk the deletion of your "neuneus messages" ... We have experience with you in this domain.
At least you are warned ...

But I don't want the subject to close at all. Let it live ...
Not everyone is of the same opinion, of course, but the discussions are courteous and relevant.
There is no need to threaten or delete messages from the subject to direct its meaning. It’s not the spirit of a forum.
Cdlt

[Macro]

... All you need is a man who walks his 5-liter jerry can in the trunk and who fills up every time he fills up with the 306 ... Like the man he thinks he heats up at behind ... The 306 it starts to consume much less ....

Pure and simple defamation ...

I would like to believe that I am a pure and simple slanderer ....

I'm just a little responsible in a French box I can just tell you that we are not dealing with teddy bears ....

That said a 306 1.9D which burns more than 8 liters / 100 ... I'm responsible for the park ... I take the car on 3 full to realize myself ...

[Christophe]

You, the septo-diverters, are surely smarter and surely hold MORE YOUR TRUTH than the engine manufacturers and researchers who work in the injection of water in the engines:

Air humidification system â € “the optimal solution for reducing fuel consumption and controlling emissions : https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... VG0pDt.pdf

Found on the other subject that you tried to pourir: https://www.econologie.com/forums/sncf-dopag ... t8250.html Thank you Flytox ... (there are others such docs by looking well)

And another: Effects of Direct Water Injection on DI Diesel Engine
C : https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... azE1K3.pdf

Found on https://www.econologie.com/forums/injection- ... t8180.html by Flytox too ...

So I'm tired of hearing the same negative arguments for years ...

[Woodcutter]

[...] That said a 306 1.9D which burns more than 8 liters / 100 ... I am responsible for the park ... I take the car on 3 full to realize myself ...

It seems to me that it was 7.42 ...

[Macro]

So I'm tired of hearing the same negative arguments for years ...

The water engine ... We've also heard about it for years ...

I am a septic surgeon certainly, not a detractor of more or less wacky experiences ... Myself I am rather in the genre stuffing a diesel with fried oil and co., A clipper with the distillation of frying ....

That said I ask only to believe it ... I am attentively following the post on doping with water by Captaine Maloche ... and if I can find the time I will experiment myself ... I would do my truth ...

I try to remain the most objective less enthusiastic ... A car driven by many hands in completely different circumstances can not be taken as a serious or at least concrete reference ... It remains my opinion ...

For pollution if the control is only based on opacities ... Suffice to say that helas ca remains a very small consolation ...

The fact of passing my ex chrysler traveling to the HV had halved the so-called opacities ...

[nlc]

but damn it is not about water engine, but doping, it has nothing to do