Suzuki Samurai 1.9 TD
Hi all. For Andrè and Pitmix, on the 400km covered, I did 2 times 100km and the rest in stages of 25km (distance to go to work, speed 90a100km Hour, maximum speed of the suzuki 115km H. It is not made to do speed ) .... My exhaust pot still spits soot, but less than before, I am nothing to take temperatures. I dismounted my reactor, no heating point. I want to install a deflector (sheet) inside the pot to force the exhaust gases on the reactor tube hoping that this will increase the temperature of the reactor. I will wait until I have traveled 1000 or 2000 km (to see ) before doing this DIY. A + ricket
0 x
Hello Ricket
There is an important detail that escapes me, did you put the reactor in the exhaust pipe or (in a duct) in the exhaust pipe?
because if you put the reactor in the exhaust pipe quite simply, you will never succeed in heating it, it must be in a tight knitted duct, without exaggerating too much to make too much restriction, we have talked about this at length the forum.
If the stem does not change color it is an indication that it lacks heat and forgets it it will not work more after 1000km.
Andre
There is an important detail that escapes me, did you put the reactor in the exhaust pipe or (in a duct) in the exhaust pipe?
because if you put the reactor in the exhaust pipe quite simply, you will never succeed in heating it, it must be in a tight knitted duct, without exaggerating too much to make too much restriction, we have talked about this at length the forum.
If the stem does not change color it is an indication that it lacks heat and forgets it it will not work more after 1000km.
Andre
0 x
Hello Andrè
Andrè if you want will see in my photo gallery (photo N ° 4) we see the exhaust elbow, the tube 1 / 2and the reactor.
The original exhaust elbow measures 54cm in diameter, the one made in stainless steel measures 60cm in outer diameter, therefore larger.
This may be why it does not heat enough or the tinkering that I want to do to reduce the volume between the inter exhaust tube and the tube1 / 2 containing the reactor.
A + ricket
Andrè if you want will see in my photo gallery (photo N ° 4) we see the exhaust elbow, the tube 1 / 2and the reactor.
The original exhaust elbow measures 54cm in diameter, the one made in stainless steel measures 60cm in outer diameter, therefore larger.
This may be why it does not heat enough or the tinkering that I want to do to reduce the volume between the inter exhaust tube and the tube1 / 2 containing the reactor.
A + ricket
0 x
ricket 79 wrote:Hello Andrè
Andrè if you want will see in my photo gallery (photo N ° 4) we see the exhaust elbow, the tube 1 / 2and the reactor.
The original exhaust elbow measures 54cm in diameter, the one made in stainless steel measures 60cm in outer diameter, therefore larger.
This may be why it does not heat enough or the tinkering that I want to do to reduce the volume between the inter exhaust tube and the tube1 / 2 containing the reactor.
A + ricket
Hello
Not look it can't work in increasing the diameter of the tube. If as I believe your engine is 1.9 td psa down to 50mm and it will work flawless !!!
@+
0 x
Said the zebra, freeman (endangered breed)
This is not because I am con I try not to do smart things.
This is not because I am con I try not to do smart things.
pantone faqs
Hello everyone ,
I just have a quick question!
We are always talking about the varnish which is deposited on the rod after a certain time of use, but never about the tube where the rod is housed !!!.
This is why I would like to know if any varnish is deposited on the surface of this tube? or a change in its surface condition, color or other? THANK YOU
lusitano@
+
I just have a quick question!
We are always talking about the varnish which is deposited on the rod after a certain time of use, but never about the tube where the rod is housed !!!.
This is why I would like to know if any varnish is deposited on the surface of this tube? or a change in its surface condition, color or other? THANK YOU
lusitano@
+
0 x
Hello Lusitano
It depends on the reactor at 100% panton the tube can be covered with black traces if you walk too cold with oil or with oil, not hot enough or reactor not hot enough, but it takes a long time, the stem is colored enough quickly and is more easily covered than the reactor tube, which in general and rather like going to sandpaper we place a light at one end and we see that it is almost as sharp as a firearm, although this kind observation is more difficult than on the stem.
The same applies to water doping for the reactor tube
except the times that I made tests with the breather after a shutdown the oil stays hot longer and the reactor at the start is still too cold to digest the oil vapors, it dirty the interior of the reactor, if we this only causes problems in the city in the long term, although 30 minutes of sustained driving will clean up the damage, or you need a system to keep nothing inside the reactor until it is hot. which would be ideal. This is the only drawback of the breather in the otherwise hot reactor there are only advantages to using these gases from the crankcase which in any case are introduced into the engine and are charged with steam of fuel and oil and water vapor.
Andre
It depends on the reactor at 100% panton the tube can be covered with black traces if you walk too cold with oil or with oil, not hot enough or reactor not hot enough, but it takes a long time, the stem is colored enough quickly and is more easily covered than the reactor tube, which in general and rather like going to sandpaper we place a light at one end and we see that it is almost as sharp as a firearm, although this kind observation is more difficult than on the stem.
The same applies to water doping for the reactor tube
except the times that I made tests with the breather after a shutdown the oil stays hot longer and the reactor at the start is still too cold to digest the oil vapors, it dirty the interior of the reactor, if we this only causes problems in the city in the long term, although 30 minutes of sustained driving will clean up the damage, or you need a system to keep nothing inside the reactor until it is hot. which would be ideal. This is the only drawback of the breather in the otherwise hot reactor there are only advantages to using these gases from the crankcase which in any case are introduced into the engine and are charged with steam of fuel and oil and water vapor.
Andre
0 x
Back to "Water injection in the engines: the assembly and experimentation"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 177 guests