Kit Pantone easily removable?

Edits and changes to engines, experiences, findings and ideas.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79122
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 12/08/09, 12:19

Does the pleasure of research mean anything to you?
0 x
User avatar
Vincho
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 27
Registration: 23/01/08, 18:08
Location: Tournai (Belgium)




by Vincho » 12/08/09, 19:24

Well, as they say "There is no small economy"

On a full 40L, at best if I go from 5L / 100km to 4,5L / 100km it's 88km more with a full ...

In addition, less consumption means above all less pollution, that's more why I want to install it, because in 1988 the catalytic converters were not yet mandatory, (it has been since 1993 according to Fred and Jamy from "C'est Pas Sorcier" hihi)
0 x
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 13/08/09, 04:26

Hello
carburologue wrote:it is or the interest of tinkering a pantone on a micra 1000 ... you will gain nothing at all and even if it works, you would reduce your consumption of 0.5 l can be not more ...

On the basis of this reason why put a water doping on diesel which works only with fry recovery oil? the oil is free.

It is not only the fuel economy which is interesting if you increase the dosage of water you have a gain in torque with a small economy, but it makes the use of the oil as efficient as diesel, and avoids problems of diluting vegetable oil with that of the engine.

Andre
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79122
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 13/08/09, 08:47

To return to the title, have you seen the ecopra or hypnow nano kit?

These are 2 easily mountable and dismountable kits.

Image

Here are pictures of the ecopra kit: https://www.econologie.com/forums/gillier-pa ... t4456.html
0 x
User avatar
Vincho
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 27
Registration: 23/01/08, 18:08
Location: Tournai (Belgium)




by Vincho » 13/08/09, 21:31

Okay, I got my exhaust pipe out of the attic. and there by seeing the diameters of the pot (outside: 35mm, inside: 32mm) I asked myself to do for the bifurcation towards the exhaust or towards the reactor, because there is a valve to place at this place and because I see on photos a pipe of only 10mm in diameter which re-enters the pot to make the endothermic reactor and that begs my question because it gives us a reduction in diameter of 25mm so for the same flow rate, we will increase the speed of the gases (Q = C * S). Because at the beginning I had found an arbor tube that was just 32mm outside diameter and I thought I would do everything up to the bubbler with pipes of this diameter.

I searched but apart from photos of bubblers, reactor and injection into the engine, I don't see any on the gas harvest
0 x
User avatar
Vincho
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 27
Registration: 23/01/08, 18:08
Location: Tournai (Belgium)




by Vincho » 13/08/09, 21:34

Just a picture of that place actually

Image
0 x
User avatar
I Citro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5129
Registration: 08/03/06, 13:26
Location: Bordeaux
x 11




by I Citro » 13/08/09, 23:17

Vincho wrote:... Because I at the beginning I found an arbor tube that was just 32mm in outside diameter and I thought I would do everything up to the bubbler with pipes of this diameter.
This kind of tube is not worth much ...
Provide a tube designed for high pressures and temperatures ...
0 x
carburologue
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 183
Registration: 14/05/06, 15:23




by carburologue » 14/08/09, 11:13

no I don't agree because at the base an eco car which is already super eco does not need to be supposedly improved. It is simply the reasoning of crazy /
and I would also add that considering the job that awaits you, is it really worth it ??? when you know that if your reactor is well done (so we admit that it works well for your engine) will make you consume maybe 0.2-0.5 l less ...

we add between the time to make it, the money, the risks that it does not work and especially that you will not consume much less ======= result drop or then you reason like crazy ///

Now I'm not saying you can't do it, but it will take more of a wacky experience than convincing results ...

the best improvements are for me: lightening, thinner tires, longer gearbox, running on gas too ... voila ...
Last edited by carburologue the 14 / 08 / 09, 11: 35, 1 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79122
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 14/08/09, 11:18

I know no really eco car !!!

Otherwise carbu could you remove the link from your signature please?
It's not really the kind of link I like to see on forums...
:|


Edit: Thank you
Last edited by Christophe the 14 / 08 / 09, 15: 40, 1 edited once.
0 x
User avatar
Vincho
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 27
Registration: 23/01/08, 18:08
Location: Tournai (Belgium)




by Vincho » 14/08/09, 15:03

When I say 5L / 100km it is really in the best of cases otherwise I am most of the time at 6L / 100km see 6,5L / 100km, because in the open countryside that I live in, it's a lot of small roads .

Pantone, I would just like to experiment with it, if it works well, I will be happy otherwise I will continue to tinker with my vehicle which will replace my car (I think it will be electric), but that's another subject. that ... I'm a bit like who would say someone who wants to "see it to believe it"

To come back to my question, I wanted to see photos if possible of the recovery of exhaust gases, because I have not found any so far, it's just to see if there are 1 inch fittings 1/4 or are these all welded pipes?
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Water injection in the engines: the assembly and experimentation"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 163 guests