AUDI 2.8 V6 water doping

Edits and changes to engines, experiences, findings and ideas.
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 19/06/08, 22:11

The rod is machined on each side, one more pointed than the other! (5cm and 2.5cm)

is it better to choose a side for the inlet and the outlet of the reactor?

Goods.
0 x
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 19/06/08, 22:21

For the thermostat c good I found pil poile what I wanted in my archives (sometimes it is useful to keep bazarr): a fan trigger contact calibrated at 85 ° c, sensor originally fixed on the rocker cover
(photo to come)


Image
Image

Multimeter tested in a pan of hot water!

Closing of the OK contact from 85 ° c as expected.
0 x
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 21/06/08, 02:58

Hello
gary wrote:The rod is machined on each side, one more pointed than the other! (5cm and 2.5cm)

is it better to choose a side for the inlet and the outlet of the reactor?

Goods.


The output side of the rod, preferable that it is cut square and that this portion is in the hot part of the exhaust
It doesn't need to be aerodynamic
A sudden relaxation at the end of the stem is preferable.
You will notice that even the retaining rod in this place turns blue (despite the distance from the hot spring)



Andre
0 x
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 24/06/08, 22:31

Thank you Andre for your advice, but in terms of cutting the tanpis rod because everything is already welded but in case or removable and modifiable!
0 x
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 24/06/08, 22:41

Here are some photos:

As you can see I let the axis of the rod protrude from the inlet side of the throttle (in case it can chop a few more calories)!

Image

Image

Image

Image
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 24/06/08, 22:51

Hello Gary

Careful realization. 8)
The dimensions (length) of your assembly seem "out of the ordinary" to me. Could you put us some odds to realize?
A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 24/06/08, 23:21

Indeed but that should not have a great insidance on the operation! (more inertia and less risk of letting droplets pass! finally I think.)

the ratings:

-tube: L 400mm, D21, d18

- rod: L 250mm refinements included, D15

- rod axis: D6mm

Centering ensured by the axis at each end of the reactor.
0 x
gary
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 29
Registration: 08/06/08, 15:53
Location: calvados




by gary » 25/06/08, 22:51

For info: the tubes at the bottom of the reactor on the last photo, it has nothing to do with the assembly it is just the exhaust outlet!
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Water injection in the engines: the assembly and experimentation"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 163 guests