Magnetic generator is make yourself ...

Various experiences made by members of the forums concerning in particular small household appliances and energy management.
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :




by izentrop » 29/03/15, 09:55

The "energy" field is difficult to grasp and everyone agrees that we have consumed the main part of the terrestrial potential in 2 centuries and that the need requires us to think about how to live only with renewables.

So-no-sen had already submitted the phenomenon of tides that is due to a gravitational effect that is felt only on very massive elements such as an ocean or the earth's crust. it follows a slow slowdown of the Earth's rotational movement, and a very slow distance from the Moon but a tidal power station has only a negligible impact.
0 x
User avatar
hic
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 995
Registration: 04/04/08, 19:50
x 5




by hic » 29/03/15, 22:22

Ahmed wrote:Izentrop, I agree with you on the bottom, but your example is lame: your stone, in falling can not, it also restore that the energy accumulated previously and coming, in the same way, of an external energy (and no of a force, stricto sensu).

hic, you write:
Why could not a magnetic field be
a source of energy equivalent to the gravitational field?

There, for once you're right to formulate this analogy!
The magnetic field of a magnet and the gravitational field have properties of the same order.
Apart from a small mistake: the gravitational field is a force and not an energy!
By mixing everything, it's not easy to understand anything!


G is an acceleration so the gravitational attraction is kinetic energy
you weigh your weight thanks to the kinetics that give you a mass and keep your feet on the ground

when we go to:
2 magnets in attraction it is the magnetic energy that is converted into kinetic energy





2 magnets in attraction are glued by kinetic energy,
like you when you keep your feet on the ground
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :




by izentrop » 29/03/15, 23:05

Static kinetic energy?
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963




by Ahmed » 30/03/15, 21:21

hic, measure your words, I don't need your "kinetics" (especially in its static form (?)) :P so that my mass (not so massive, by the way!) and my foolishness keep your feet firmly on the ground and convince me of the inappropriateness of your example!
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
hic
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 995
Registration: 04/04/08, 19:50
x 5




by hic » 03/05/15, 18:24

Ahmed wrote:hic, measure your words, I don't need your "kinetics" (especially in its static form (?)) :P so that my mass (not so massive, by the way!) and my foolishness keep your feet firmly on the ground and convince me of the inappropriateness of your example!
The g ("g" being the initial of "gravitational")
is an acceleration unit corresponding approximately to the acceleration of gravity on the surface of the Earth.

Its conventional value, defined by the 1901 Third General Weights and Measures Conference

There is only kinetics that can generate a mass by attraction
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963




by Ahmed » 03/05/15, 18:55

Between current language and that used by scientists, there is enough to go astray, indeed; however that may be, it will not steal a force into an energy.
And all this does not run this damn "magnetic" motor that seems loath to contradict the laws of thermodynamics ... and, who could blame it *? :P

* See my last post on the thread dedicated to Roddier.
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
hic
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 995
Registration: 04/04/08, 19:50
x 5




by hic » 03/05/15, 22:10

Ahmed wrote:Between current language and that used by scientists, there is enough to go astray, indeed; however that may be, it will not steal a force into an energy.
And all this does not run this damn "magnetic" motor that seems loath to contradict the laws of thermodynamics ... and, who could blame it *? :P

* See my last post on the thread dedicated to Roddier.

1. you do not know einstein at the level for nil!
2. an electric motor does not contradict the thermodynamics,
but goes beyond the framework of Newtonian counter-reaction mechanics
for a motor 1kW of electrical energy -> 1kW of magnetic energy -> 1kW of mechanical energy
the total of the magnetic fields is insufficient to make a Newtonian counter-reaction
with 1kW of magnetic energy we can only put 2 times 1 / 2kW of magnetic energy in opposition,
but that does not contradict thermodynamics, provided you change the mechanics!
otherwise a motor would be a top spinning all by itself, it would be magic! with a trampoline magic again repeat again that you do not understand the 1.
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963




by Ahmed » 03/05/15, 22:35

I see you're invoking the principle of authority in convening Einstein to your help!
While an electric motor does not contradict the laws of physics, but this is not the case of what is the subject of this thread.

Your equation of transformation of energy is inaccurate, since a part is transformed into caloric energy between electricity and magnetism, by joule effect and friction: the yield of an engine is never of 100%. At the mechanical level, new losses appear, even more important ...

Rather than defending mordicus dubious theories, would it not be more convincing to run this bugger of engine, lover of "feedback"?
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
hic
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 995
Registration: 04/04/08, 19:50
x 5




by hic » 03/05/15, 22:54

previously, you invoked static acceleration for 'G' gravitation Bravo! ridiculous!

Here you invoke the performance (minor problem) Bravo! a weakness to scare!

You do not have any sense : Evil:

baraka akbar : Mrgreen:

Ahmed wrote:I see you're invoking the principle of authority in convening Einstein to your help!
While an electric motor does not contradict the laws of physics, but this is not the case of what is the subject of this thread.

Your equation of transformation of energy is inaccurate, since a part is transformed into caloric energy between electricity and magnetism, by joule effect and friction: the yield of an engine is never of 100%. At the mechanical level, new losses appear, even more important ...

Rather than defending mordicus dubious theories, would it not be more convincing to run this bugger of engine, lover of "feedback"?
: Mrgreen:
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963




by Ahmed » 04/05/15, 13:45

When you produce a surunitary "feedback" engine, then I will sink into the most complete ridiculous ... : Mrgreen:
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "econological Laboratory: different experiences for econologic"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 42 guests