A new, absolutely [not] revolutionary donkey

[Arthur]

oh well you know, I lock this topic.

anyway, he has not been moving in the right direction for a long time, and Arthuryou are not there for nothing.

Thanks anyway for exposing your ideas, but a little too vaguely.

Good luck in your project, but all that has been said to you is not stupid by putting the bickering aside.

Sincerely,

Bickering, as you say, is still nothing, but when you receive insults, when you try to make my system understood and treat me as a smoker, an ass etc. and, the icing on the cake, still receive a "warning" especially by the one who started with the insults, by locking me the forumit is a height that can only come from a kindergarten class !!!! nothing more........
I thought I might meet interesting people on this forum and, very disappointed I realize that I found only kids during the recreat ........ Regards

[Arthur]

I have everyone who takes me for a fun

Uh, not me

So I rest my previous question to have details on the mechanics of the retarder itself ...

But you can answer me in MP if you prefer ... which will accredit your seriousness which I do not doubt.

If you let me know your details and you confirm that you want to continue a serious discussion between adults, then maybe I would ........

[gildas]

Hello Mr Arturo,

At the bottom of your mailbox, just click on the "attachment" tab and "add files" then "insert in the line"

B9712486104Z.1_20170701125220_000+G539C342A.1-0[1].jpg (40.39 Kio) Consulté 1556 fois

Cdlt

[Christophe]

that you want to continue a serious discussion between adults, so maybe I would ........

There you clearly enter the narcissistic perversion ...

Tell us: Have you already consulted? Otherwise you should think about it ... it's never too late!

You deliberately omit the calculations that are done FOR YOU ... and which CLEARLY demonstrate that the system has STRICTLY NO FUTURE ... except with a very important traffic!

Go and put a layer on it I'll try to explain it to you differently ...

If each car allows you 1Wh of "net" recovery (= injected into the network), see my previous message for the calculations (and those of the other members) ... you need 1000 passages to make 1 kWh (= 0.15 cts) and therefore 100 for 000 € turnover ... okay?

If your system costs 20 000 € at installation (which is not expensive at all for a road system) then 100 000 * 20 000 / 15 = 133 MILLIONS of cars passing to make the 20 000 € profitable ...

How long will 133 MILLIONS cars pass on the system?

On 1 year this represents a frequency of: 133M / 8740 = 15 000 cars per hour is 4.2 per second continuously and this 24 / 24, 7 / 7 ... it is 500 times more than the frequency that you announce 1 car / 2 minutes .... seriously !! An 500 margin of error is a lot, it's as if you were paid 3 € instead of 1500 € per month ...

Finally seriously believe that the system will resist (mechanically) 133 MILLIONS passages without maintenance cost?

[Arthur]

that you want to continue a serious discussion between adults, so maybe I would ........

There you clearly enter the narcissistic perversion ...

Tell us: Have you already consulted? Otherwise you should think about it ... it's never too late!

You deliberately omit the calculations that are done FOR YOU ... and which CLEARLY demonstrate that the system has STRICTLY NO FUTURE ... except with a very important traffic!

Go and put a layer on it I'll try to explain it to you differently ...

If each car allows you 1Wh of "net" recovery (= injected into the network), see my previous message for the calculations (and those of the other members) ... you need 1000 passages to make 1 kWh (= 0.15 cts) and therefore 100 for 000 € turnover ... okay?

If your system costs 20 000 € at installation (which is not expensive at all for a road system) then 100 000 * 20 000 / 15 = 133 MILLIONS of cars passing to make the 20 000 € profitable ...

How long will 133 MILLIONS cars pass on the system?

On 1 year this represents a frequency of: 133M / 8740 = 15 000 cars per hour is 4.2 per second continuously and this 24 / 24, 7 / 7 ... it is 500 times more than the frequency that you announce 1 car / 2 minutes .... seriously !! An 500 margin of error is a lot, it's as if you were paid 3 € instead of 1500 € per month ...

Finally seriously believe that the system will resist (mechanically) 133 MILLIONS passages without maintenance cost?

You can continue to treat me all the bird names and I can continue to see that you stay on your calculations next to the plate without trying to think about my data, so continue like this and good wind !!!!! !

[Leo Maximus]

... We must also think user comfortsee the current catastrophe:

User comfort? That is to say ?

At 1:30: "... after several passages we swore never again ... "

Very good ! Wise decision !

The speed bumps are used to protect pedestrians at home.

Let the "users" first begin to respect speed limits in town and pedestrians at 100%, and these p ...... speed bumps can be removed.

[Arthur]

Hello Mr Arturo,

At the bottom of your mailbox, just click on the "attachment" tab and "add files" then "insert in the line"

B9712486104Z.1_20170701125220_000+G539C342A.1-0[1].jpg

Cdlt

Thank you Mr Gildas, I did not notice, still excuse me !!!!! GOOD LUCK !!!!!

[Arthur]

... We must also think user comfortsee the current catastrophe:

User comfort? That is to say ?

At 1:30: "... after several passages we swore never again ... "

Very good ! Wise decision !

The speed bumps are used to protect pedestrians at home.

Let the "users" first begin to respect speed limits in town and pedestrians at 100%, and these p ...... speed bumps can be removed.

I have already answered that, I do not want to repeat myself without stopping ...........

[Leo Maximus]

There are fewer losses when directly rotating a flywheel generator:

(View of the generator and its flywheel at 1: 20).

[Christophe]

You can continue to treat me all the bird names and I can continue to see that you stay on your calculations next to the plate without trying to think about my data, so continue like this and good wind !!!!! !

No bird names in this message ... paranoia is common with narcissistic perversion ...

Your data (except 2 or 3 figures: which ones ???) are completely utopian and out of nowhere !!

You can try to scam investors with your numbers, but not us ...

I tell you of an 3ieme method:
a) If we recover 1Wh per vehicle (our data KINETIC ENERGY AND TRANSFORMATION PERFORMANCE INCLUDED)
b) You want to do 10kW continuously (your data)
c) That means 10 000 cars per hour is 2.8 per second !!
1 Wh = 3600 Joules
10 kW during 1h = 10 kWh = 36 000 000 Joules