Econokit, yet a water doping kit for sale

[Christophe]

Big peak of visits on this subject around 13h there was surely a Nieme report on the econokit in the newspaper of TF1 or FR2 ... someone saw it?

[the middle]

It was not on TF1,
it was on china one
To listen to until the end
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QP9oxva3As

[Christophe]

China one ???? wtf? Thanks for the video I watch ...

No it should not be that since:

Added by ECONOKIT the Jan 10, 2012

[dedeleco]

1,3 billion Chinese people with their own cars, each with their Econokit placebo, that makes Econokit dream !!!

[Other]

Hello

Can you get feedback from users on these kits? Even water consumption per 100km, consumption before consumption after installation, water temperature of the bubbler.
I am always surprised to see the low qauntity of water announced by these kits (I must be in error with my 1, 2 and more liters of water per 100km and the cultivators with their tractors too? or so there is something that escapes me?
I would like to lower my water consumption for the same yield that would not force me after 200km to stop to fill the 3,8 liters (1 US Gallon) tank

Andre

[Flytox]

Hello

Can you get feedback from users on these kits? Even water consumption per 100km, consumption before consumption after installation, water temperature of the bubbler.
I am always surprised to see the low qauntity of water announced by these kits (I must be in error with my 1, 2 and more liters of water per 100km and the cultivators with their tractors too? or so there is something that escapes me?
I would like to lower my water consumption for the same yield that would not force me after 200km to stop to fill the 3,8 liters (1 US Gallon) tank

Andre

The temperature of their "vapor" is much lower than what we obtain (between 45 and 60 °?), Moreover they do not use a venturi. There is a certain logic in their water consumption being low, they evaporate much less than we do with a lower gas circulation. On the other hand, I still don't have the proof that it works better or worse than our systems.

[gildas]

Hi,

No need to put water in the bubbler for the Econokit installed on a petrol or LPG engine:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQgJEptSJcg

[Flytox]

Weird the thing. AMHA it is only at idle or at the very small openings of the throttle that the gas can be sucked at the end of the pot given the lengths / diameters of the different ducts ..... from there to fill the "bubbler" (filter gasoline) of water ????, there is a step that I would not take when driving at constant speed on the road to the motorway .... They do not announce pollution and consumption reduction figures.

[Other]

Hello

the difference is slim with the ERG system
put it on while he is looking for the cooled exhaust gas with condensed water vapor (in winter) and pass it through a mini reactor (warm) because I don't think he has to capture a large heat in a reactor leaned against an exhaust. On a gasoline there is always a fairly consistent depression even at mid regime.
On a diesel I have doubts about this principle, fouling of the conduits in the short term. On a diesel, any exhaust gas circulation in the reactor is avoided.

Test to do
What does a direct connection without passing through the reactor give?
Should we try to make a comparison with a system like the VIX to compare the results consumption, pollution?

If the kit is sold in many copies, it should not be long before we get figures?

Andre

[pauline82]

Plasmanu have you been able to use your fogger and what are the results?