Monsanto Roundup deadly to humans - Glyphosate

[Janic]

I'm not kidding, it's completely plausible. Many toxic products can be used as drugs http://www.ditesnonaladrogue.be/la-veri ... n-brochure.

The drugs that do the most damage, today, are not sniffing products, but those that are absorbed daily by everyone (and even more so among legal sniffers such as smokers.) Like chemical drugs or quite simply the coffee and alcohol, among others.

[izentrop]

[izentrop]

The decoders of the world are messing around or decrypting truncated and partisan information:
In this section:

1. Decoders mislead controversy
2. Decoders mix studies
3. Decoders relay a fable
4. Decoders Suggest False Balance
5. Silent decoders on "Portier Papers"
6. On the economic aspects too, Les Décodeurs provides one-way information
   Information or manipulation of opinion?

http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article3015

[Janic]

as proof of sites like pseudo science! It is to give the stick to be beaten!

[Gébé]

The important thing is not the container but the content.

[Janic]

The important thing is not the container but the content.

that's right! but when in the basket of apples all are rotten, it is the rot that is involved, not the basket itself. And in this case this basket is filled with fake news that nobody, among his aficionados, takes the trouble to check!

[Gébé]

For example?

[izentrop]

The container is without conflict of interest http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article65

The important thing is not the container but the content.

that's right! but when in the basket of apples all are rotten, it is the rot that is involved, not the basket itself. And in this case this basket is filled with fake news that nobody, among his aficionados, takes the trouble to check!

Perfect bad faith because everything that is written is verifiable (annotations and sources at the bottom of the page).

And yes, example?

[Janic]

The container is without conflict of interest http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article65

There are not only financial conflicts of interest, there is also ideology, conformism of thought, because this is the most widespread discourse today.

Janic wrote:

The important thing is not the container but the content.

that's right! but when in the basket of apples all are rotten, it is the rot that is involved, not the basket itself. And in this case this basket is filled with fake news that nobody, among his aficionados, takes the trouble to check!

Perfect bad faith because everything that is written is verifiable (annotations and sources at the bottom of the page).

Bad faith is a universal commodity, shared by all those who take their faith, precisely, for cash. We are therefore ALL concerned.

And yes, example?

You must have read the different comments I made on certain assertions from various articles they published and where the authors don't have the skills as on homeopathy. How many professionals in this specialty are part of this AFIS?
Same thing for HIV / AIDS
Or this one
http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article1017
who pretends to be the judge of something that he completely ignores and that I will analyze as soon as possible. It is not enough to be loaded with diplomas and references, which impress the ignorant, to hold any truth.

[Ahmed]

From the start of the article you cite, Janic, the author states incongruities. Thus, he asserts that ethical or philosophical considerations do not fall within the domain of rationality (only Science would be able!). Further on, he more or less endorses the fact that the cause of hunger in the world is linked to the poor output of livestock farming compared to direct food production; in reality, it is only an aggravating factor, but to reduce malnutrition to technical considerations is entirely inappropriate, since the real causes are above all social and political.