Monsanto Roundup deadly to humans - Glyphosate

[Ahmed]

The video cited above is no longer available at the address indicated, but it remains visible here

[izentrop]

Some informed comments (from the video) clearly show that the purpose of this documentary is only to create an audience, without any respect for scientific realities:

micha74000
1 weeks ago
"Soy is today recognized as an occupational allergen in industry, due to prolamins, aeroallergenic proteins in the shell, responsible for severe asthma."
Well, it seemed to me that it was milk that was involved in asthma!
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soja

Ivy Keith is an old veggie.

"The soybean in the world today is very predominantly GMO and comes mainly from the United States, Argentina and Brazil. It is especially this soybean that supplies European livestock. According to a 2007-2008 report on Of total soybean production in the world, soybeans are 91% GM soybeans in the United States, 98% in Argentina and 64% in Brazil. It has of course increased since then. "
http://www.canalacademie.com/ida5697-Cu ... u-pas.html
France has refused GMOs, which are a privatization of life.

"Profits :
- Provision of vegetable proteins of good biological value.
- Provision of essential amino acids.
- Prevention of osteoporosis.
- Random decrease in menopause symptoms (inconstant).
- Decrease in blood cholesterol.
The risks :
- Allergic risk.
- Calcium deficiency.
- Worsening of hypothyroidism.
- Inactivation of certain treatments.
- Risk of malformation (gestation, lactation, infant). […] ”
http://www.cite-sciences.fr/fr/au-progr ... oja-sante/

20 years of transgenic soybeans in the Southern Cone of Latin America, 20 reasons to ban it permanently
https://www.grain.org/fr/article/entrie ... nitivement

https://www.quechoisir.org/actualite-bo ... oja-n5699/
GMO soy product from the USA, whose company is listed on NASDAQ, tested on pigs. Pyramid-style sales! Many resellers on the net.
It was I who sent all the information obtained to the Association of consumers UFC-QUE CHOISIR who analyzed the product. Que Choisir works with Prescrire, an independent pharmaceutical industry review.

World soybean production
"Soy cultivation is the main cause of deforestation in the Amazon, which has grown by 70% in Brazil. Soybean cultivation occupies more than 1 million square kilometers worldwide, an area twice that of France."
https://www.planetoscope.com/cereales/2 ... -soja.html
As all land needs to "rest", let's wait a bit, soon they will cut the last trees in the Amazon !! Fortunately, France is still fighting against this productivism .....


player6860
1 weeks ago
Here are the links to real scientific studies on soy! I only chose the meta-analyzes, that is to say the most rigorous experimental plans in science:
- The slimming effect of soy compared to meat: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28916571
- Reduced risk of breast cancer (contrary to what these people paid by the animal feed industry say in this report): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586662
- No impact on male hormones: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19524224
- Reduced risk of fractures: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20613672
- Reduced risk of prostate cancer https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300347
- Decrease in blood sugar: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004555
- Improvement of cognition and visual memory: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003621

And I stop there because there are more than 130 meta-analyzes in scientific literature on the benefits of soy, which literally represents thousands and thousands of studies on the subject! Everything is accessible free of charge on pubmed for those who want to take the trouble to learn and unravel the true from the false: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

The authors of this report are liars or incompetent. Apart from the part on glyphosate, there is nothing good to learn from this report.

Nyxx1710
there 2 days
Thank you all for these informed comments!
The report by France 5 is still very doubtful: a staging to scare and make the audience (in BFM TV sauce), more than crude caricatures on vegetarianism, huge omissions on obvious elements (the glyphosate is used worldwide on a lot of crops and even in your neighbors' lawns), etc.


[Janic]

Some informed comments (from the video) clearly show that the purpose of this documentary is only to create an audience, without any respect for scientific realities:

The so-called scientific truths are only punctual realities dependent on those who make studies as punctual. Soybean producers and distributors present contradictory studies on this product and this does not resolve the question of whether it is the soybean as such as responsible, or where it comes from, how it is grown, how be transformed, and even consumed.
However, this vegetable is, UNFORTUNATELY, considered as a substitute for meat and therefore consumed in an excessive way because the phobia of the lack of these famous proteins, which the industry of the bidoche recommends by the nutritionists with the orders of this industry, conditioned the spirits.
So it is this phobia that must be combated by showing that this compensatory research is artificial and that the needs of human organisms are much less demanding in protein than official dietetics, on orders, wants us to believe and our protein needs ( especially their particular component in amino acids) are largely covered by a traditional vegetable consumption and local production.

Ivy Keith is an old veggie.

That said, this does not call into question vegetarianism as such, concerning your video, but ignorance and especially the lack of experience and practice in this area. But it is true that this way of eating has its own inconsistencies like those of consumption of jugs. The proof being the important illness and mortality directly linked to the mode of consumption of animal products.

As for glyphosate, it is quite possible and even probable that there is a double effect of a product unsuitable for the natural consumption of pigs, that is soy, whose essential role remains to make the animal grow faster, to the detriment of its genetic effects. This does not clear the fact that this aspect is little studied, officially, according to the view expressed in this video. We should therefore compare (this has probably already been done elsewhere), sows fed organic soybeans with sows fed GMO soybeans and glyphosate.
As a reminder, Pedersen does not observe any malformations after the introduction of Roundup ready soybeans in 1997, replacing their usual food with soybeans too, and it is therefore Roundup responsible for these malformations.

https://books.google.fr/books?id=h_w4Dw ... ns&f=false

[izentrop]

As a reminder, Pedersen does not notice any malformations until after the introduction of Roundup ready soybeans in 1997, by replacing their usual food with soybeans as well, and it is therefore Roundup responsible for these malformations.

https://books.google.fr/books?id=h_w4Dw ... ns & f = false

Don't you feel like you are being manipulated by Marie-Monique? A piglet with 2 heads, let's see, just to mark a little more the spirits ... and it works, the proof.

[Janic]

Don't you feel like you are being manipulated by Marie-Monique?

Don't you feel like you are being manipulated by Monsanto? Otherwise you should get out of your bubble!

A 2-headed piglet, let's see, just to make a little more impression ... and it works, the proof.

Fetal malformations of all kinds fill jars in large numbers and some victims survive for some time
https://www.google.fr/search?q=malforma ... 66&bih=662

He is no worse blind than one who does not want to see!

[izentrop]

Mutations, there have always been and many more failures than successful ones, but there, what you do not understand, is that the testimony of a breeder is enough for him to accuse glyphosate and Monsanto and you, you gobes

[Janic]

Mutations, there have always been and many more failures than successful ones, but there, what you do not understand, is that the testimony of a breeder is enough for him to accuse glyphosate and Monsanto and you, you gobes

you keep on taking the others for fools, for the rest.
A finding is not an accusation even though that may be the only possible route. You are so obsessed with defending this poisoner that you lose the simplest reason. who wrote: "Having reason to believe does not mean that you have reason to believe."
https://fr.sott.net/article/1013-L-herb ... ngenitales
A large recent scientific study has confirmed the growing belief that the most widely used chemical herbicide in the world, Monsanto Corporation's Roundup, is toxic and a danger to the human body as well as to animals. The latest scientific research, carried out by a multinational scientific team led by Professor Andrés Carrasco, director of the Laboratory of Molecular Embryology at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Buenos Aires and member of the National Council on Scientific and Technical Research Argentina, presents the alarming demonstration that Monsanto and the agro-food industry of GMOs have systematically lied about the safety of their Roundup. At concentrations far lower than those used in agriculture, Roundup is linked to birth defects. The implications are enormous for health. All the major GM crops on the market today are genetically engineered to "tolerate" the herbicide Roundup.
and this is not just a simple pig farmer.

[izentrop]

https://fr.sott.net/article/1013-L-herb ... ngenitales
A large recent scientific study has confirmed the growing conviction ...

2010 http://alerte-environnement.fr/2010/11/ ... -seralini/

[Janic]

2010 http://alerte-environnement.fr/2010/11/ ... -seralini/

you definitely have a knack for finding "trash" articles, it is very, very far from being of the scientific type.
Just like this: Veganism kills slowly. Ignore at the start, ignore at the end.
and this one which is no better: "Michel Cymes tells us about the increased risk of depression in vegetarians" As if Michel Cymes knew something about it!

[Janic]

on France 2 at 13h15: the human and health damage of glyphosate in argentina.