Hello everyone, and thank you for your opinions.
So has this idea already appeared as a farce in a Science et Vie? I thought I was original ... Finally, innovations sometimes come from eccentric ideas, you have to say that !!
Indeed I probably got on fire by saying that the mountains could "push back". It seemed logical to me at the time, but on reflection it seems a little capillotracted ...
After as for the problem of particle size, it all depends what is the limit that we set !!
On the other hand, the idea of the chairlift seems to me to deepen.
Or it could possibly be possible to use this same process, without using the rock, but using metallic masses (we would be closer to densities of 5, or even much more !!)
The idea would then be to use the potential energy of these masses, always by bringing them down, during peak periods, and then raising them during off-peak periods. In addition we could smooth the production curve !!
With efficiency and self-consumption, we could, with large installations, produce in the 500 MW, or half a nuclear power plant !!
What do you think ?
PS: no, this is not a troll ... :-(
Exploitation of the mechanical energy of the rock
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Le_Gaulois wrote:PS: no, this is not a troll ... :-(
What do you think ?
I have thandce à pento be which YES
Pfff, joint arrival of Le_Gaulois, Gaston and Cheval ??? Why not Perplex and QuoVadis on the same day?
don't feed
Last edited by Obamot the 22 / 11 / 10, 17: 16, 1 edited once.
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79117
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10973
In fact I was not thinking of the Gallic troll ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79117
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10973
Absolutely, it would be interesting to find the S&V article in question ...
Just to see the shape.
For the rest, I remain on the position of my 1st answer.
Just to see the shape.
For the rest, I remain on the position of my 1st answer.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
I find you a little hard with me Obamot.
I never attacked anyone, or even launched a troll. I just explained an idea, which seems entirely possible to me. The proof: we already use a similar principle with water retention dams !!
I came on this forum to try to exchange, to propose my ideas and to learn more than by the "conventional" ways.
Now, if you take me for a troll because Cheval (even if his "pressure group" had made me jump and laugh a bit anyway) or Gaston (?) Came to comment here ... I find it a bit pity...
I never attacked anyone, or even launched a troll. I just explained an idea, which seems entirely possible to me. The proof: we already use a similar principle with water retention dams !!
I came on this forum to try to exchange, to propose my ideas and to learn more than by the "conventional" ways.
Now, if you take me for a troll because Cheval (even if his "pressure group" had made me jump and laugh a bit anyway) or Gaston (?) Came to comment here ... I find it a bit pity...
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79117
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10973
Le_Gaulois wrote:I find you a little hard with me Obamot.
+1
Please refocus.
Let's find the S&V.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 291 guests