Take it easy !!!
At the beginning, Christophe was based on
35 nuclear reactors. It turns out that this is actually
1 unhappy TWh out of the 488 consumed each year in France, i.e.
0.2% of total consumption: There is nothing to get excited about !!!
In addition, I repeat myself:
There remains a hydroelectric potential of
30TWh (6% of annual consumption), in addition to
70 already operated. It is also in the process of development because nuclear power needs backup and energy needs are increasing. It seems to me that it is around
+ 3TWh per year until 2020. However, it is not without environmental consequences.
Despite the so-called "nuclear lobby", France is the 2nd European park installed after Norway as well as the 11th hydroelectric producer country in the world, it's not bad, but it is certain that we will never be the 1st. , relief and climate oblige !!!
The hydroelectric potential of a country is calculable and in the case of France, we are already exploiting 70% of this potential, not without environmental consequences also unfortunately ... hell being paved with good intentions.
Reminder of the Swedish energy mix: 45% nuclear, 45% hydroelectric, .... Nuclear is by no means the enemy of hydroelectricity and most countries also exploit their potential. It is a very practical energy.
So I think there is no point in taking the cabbage for
0,2%. I don't see how it will change the energy problem to come.
Cdlt
ps:
Christophe wrote:I leave you a little alone less than 2 hours and I see that it has heated to a rotting of the subject ...
Rare are forums where everyone is of the same opinion or it's not called a "forum". Perhaps we should simply moderate the aggressiveness of some contributors and everything would be fine without slippage ...