Thermoacoustic generator
-
- I learn econologic
- posts: 17
- Registration: 02/04/07, 19:42
- Location: Reims
Remundo wrote:Vooouuiiii! So I’ll put a speaker in there to make sine current
Yes, by the way, to recover energy, is it better to have a speaker or a microphone?
Well the experience of nlc proves at least one thing: I am a "b * rne" in experimentation. And to think that I have a graduate degree in ... BIP ... experimental, shame.
Okay, I bought some gas and I'm going to get a pyrex test tube. I think to start again this end of cemaine.
In addition, nobody said anything about the conical holes: false good idea or well?
A+
Gilles
0 x
Uh, small precision, it was not mon experimentation !! ))))
For your question, a microphone in principle is like a speaker but much smaller. Finally, it depends on what type of microphone we are talking about.
So it's better to have a good speaker, with a good big magnet. But hey in the end, there is surely something more suitable, a real linear generator in fact.
For your question, a microphone in principle is like a speaker but much smaller. Finally, it depends on what type of microphone we are talking about.
So it's better to have a good speaker, with a good big magnet. But hey in the end, there is surely something more suitable, a real linear generator in fact.
0 x
-
- I learn econologic
- posts: 17
- Registration: 02/04/07, 19:42
- Location: Reims
nlc wrote:Uh, small precision, it was not mon experimentation !! ))))
Yes, it was just a shortcut and a repeat of what Remundo had said.
nlc wrote: But hey in the end, there is surely something more suitable, a real linear generator in fact.
That, I suspected. But I also suspect that it is not under the hooves of a horse (I do not find the smiley that is going well, but there: total acquiessement without any animosity).
Is there a simple way to measure the energy output from this kind of ... experimenting?
0 x
I don't know anything about measuring energy.
But if we reason on a loudspeaker, the electrical energy that we provide is transformed into an acoustic pressure. Except for the output, this electrical energy is therefore necessarily converted by the loudspeaker into acoustic "energy"?
Now is there a way to know from "the volume" of sound, its potential energy, I don't know at all, it would take the advice of a specialist in acoustics
But if we reason on a loudspeaker, the electrical energy that we provide is transformed into an acoustic pressure. Except for the output, this electrical energy is therefore necessarily converted by the loudspeaker into acoustic "energy"?
Now is there a way to know from "the volume" of sound, its potential energy, I don't know at all, it would take the advice of a specialist in acoustics
0 x
Good evening Le_Courtois
You are asking a good question. From a technological point of view, microphone and speaker are the same object, simply the acoustoelectric conversion is done:
- electric -> noise for the loudspeaker
- noise -> electric for the microphone.
For better power, you would need a speaker, because the microphones are not designed for powers beyond the human channel (a few W) while the most powerful HP spit out hundreds of W.
For your little tubes, a microphone certainly does the trick
Now, the ideal would be to design a specific HP to the resonance frequency of your tube / stack. That is to say that it reacts very particularly to the fundamental of the signal which excites it ...
But no, you are not a burne! You have to take the time and find the right gear, that's all
@+
le_courtois wrote:Remundo wrote:Vooouuiiii! So I’ll put a speaker in there to make sine current
Yes, by the way, to recover energy, is it better to have a speaker or a microphone?
You are asking a good question. From a technological point of view, microphone and speaker are the same object, simply the acoustoelectric conversion is done:
- electric -> noise for the loudspeaker
- noise -> electric for the microphone.
For better power, you would need a speaker, because the microphones are not designed for powers beyond the human channel (a few W) while the most powerful HP spit out hundreds of W.
For your little tubes, a microphone certainly does the trick
Now, the ideal would be to design a specific HP to the resonance frequency of your tube / stack. That is to say that it reacts very particularly to the fundamental of the signal which excites it ...
But no, you are not a burne! You have to take the time and find the right gear, that's all
@+
Last edited by Remundo the 24 / 04 / 08, 22: 15, 1 edited once.
0 x
nlc wrote:I don't know anything about measuring energy.
But if we reason on a loudspeaker, the electrical energy that we provide is transformed into an acoustic pressure. Except for the output, this electrical energy is therefore necessarily converted by the loudspeaker into acoustic "energy"?
Now is there a way to know from "the volume" of sound, its potential energy, I don't know at all, it would take the advice of a specialist in acoustics
Well you need an acoustic dBmeter ... Compared to the videos I saw, (and especially heard ), it makes the noise of a TV "not set too loud", it is about the conversation between 2 people, s between 50 and 70 dBacoustics
here look:
http://www.bestofmicro.com/guide/base-E ... 5OQ==.html
It is well summarized.
@ + and good crafts to both of you!
0 x
- Capt_Maloche
- Moderator
- posts: 4559
- Registration: 29/07/06, 11:14
- Location: Ile-de-France
- x 42
Thanks for the video
This pseudo stirling intrigues me
relatively simple to make
This pseudo stirling intrigues me
relatively simple to make
0 x
"Consumption is similar to a search consolation, a way to fill a growing existential void. With, the key, a lot of frustration and a little guilt, increasing the environmental awareness." (Gérard Mermet)
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
Industrial thermoacoustic refrigerators:
http://www.qdrive.com/
The reverse of what we are trying to do, in short ...
But as the effect is normally reversible
http://www.qdrive.com/
The reverse of what we are trying to do, in short ...
But as the effect is normally reversible
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 4 Replies
- 4989 views
-
Last message by patou
View the latest post
08/01/23, 20:49A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 13 Replies
- 11811 views
-
Last message by phil59
View the latest post
20/06/22, 16:31A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 0 Replies
- 6288 views
-
Last message by Peter0922
View the latest post
02/02/22, 11:52A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 1 Replies
- 6509 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
11/01/22, 18:48A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
-
- 113 Replies
- 37746 views
-
Last message by moinsdewatt
View the latest post
25/08/18, 18:05A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 262 guests