Equivalence production of solar, wind and nuclear

Rulian · by **Rulian** » 08/09/08, 13:05

First: Your data is more than ten years old.

Second: the load factor is determined by the system for calculating feed-in tariffs. On the old one, it was disadvantageous to try to go further than 2000 h. But since July 2007, 2400, the new system passed with the ZDE makes it interesting to go to XNUMX h. And don't worry, the producers will reach it since it's their interest The limit for the moment is not physical, but determined by the financial interest according to the method of calculating the feed-in tariff.

See the decree (appendices)

jonule · by **jonule** » 09/09/08, 15:04

JANCO! JANCO! JANCO!

it was he who advocated leaving the Grenelle withdrawal of the precautionary principle, because anti-competitive?

ah the numbers and the curves ... it causes! I'm sure there is no better than that to hit the wind! Didn't you find worse, Christophe? : Mrgreen:

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 09/09/08, 15:10

Jonule you will quickly get out of this forum if you continue to behave like this ...

You speak of anti competitive ... very badly crossed coming from you!

So explain to us where you surf on forums?

Strangely we noticed that your messages are exclusively posted during office hours .... and never after 16:30 p.m. ... : Mrgreen:

jonule · by **jonule** » 09/09/08, 15:37

? What do you mean there? what relationship between competition and my participation in this forum ?

and it's still not my fault if you often quote jancovici, which is not a benchmark in the quality of its judgments anyway! when we see the conclusions of the Grenelle?

jonule · by **jonule** » 09/09/08, 15:38

then ... are you spying on me or what?
and who allows you to display this info?
someone asked you?

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 09/09/08, 15:42

jonule wrote:and it's still not my fault if you often quote jancovici, which is not a benchmark in the quality of its judgments anyway! when we see the conclusions of the Grenelle?

Ah because you think your judgments are better?

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 09/09/08, 15:46

jonule wrote:then ... are you spying on me or what?
and who allows you to display this info?
someone asked you?

What info? What are you talking about? Everything is here: https://www.econologie.com/forums/search.php ... hor=jonule

No need to watch yourself to see that you only post during office hours ... and nothing, never during Week Ends. It jumps in the face to all the regulars ...

There's nothing like "info" ... sorry to disappoint you.

jonule · by **jonule** » 09/09/08, 15:56

why are you showing that christophe? anyone interested?

I notice that you too post during work hours, like others, what does that prove?

this weekend I was going rock'n'roll no offense, otherwise I also have things to do, like everyone else!

yes as you say you disappoint me a little anyway ...

but back to our sheep: you were quoting Jancovici as a farm windmill from 1997 produces only as 2000h, measurement made on 1 ONLY windmill, and actually given dating from 1997 ... it is at the point of Jancovici technology! : Lol:

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 09/09/08, 16:06

jonule wrote:but back to our sheep: you were quoting Jancovici as a farm windmill from 1997 produces only as 2000h, measurement made on 1 ONLY windmill, and actually given dating from 1997 ... it is at the point of Jancovici technology!

A farm is only one wind turbine according to you?
Do you know a lot of 10 MW wind turbines each?

Again you are delusional ...

ps: for my work schedule, not only is it wrong (I sometimes post at 2 am as at 23 pm as at 7 am) but in addition I am independent so I still have the right to manage my schedule as I want (your 35h I do it in 3 to 4 days approximately) ...

jonule · by **jonule** » 09/09/08, 16:15

yes brief on ONE group of wind turbines, I mean all placed in the same direction on the same site!
and 10MW is what wind turbines do today.

PS: so that's it you want us to compare all 2, in public not in MP?

already I'm not at 35 o'clock what do you imagine, knowing everything?
and after that ?

I work on a computer I have internet access, I use it for work and I "have" to be connected to this electronic thing, even if before my job was done on paper ...
but that doesn't prevent me from checking my mailbox and taking breaks as I see fit!
Besides, that's what I'm going to do right away and go have a coffee.

what matters is not the passing of time: it's what you make of it.
the job has to be done. after that depends on how you see things, and the functions.

I too could leave the job to devote myself to a forum and re-sell items on a shop ... even at the same time as my job, here! : Idea:

Join an algorithmic censorship-free community of enthusiasts, technicians, scientists or engineers. Ads removed after registration.

Equivalence production of solar, wind and nuclear

Who is online ?

Do a in-depth textual research ou look for an image, a drawing, a graphic on the forum

Explanations on the image search by Google or Qwant or other.