moinsdewatt wrote:And it will last like this on this thread for years. It’s already seen.
Another very constructive remark ...
It is good to be critical, but still we should be critical of what we take for granted.
What we thought we knew 2 years ago has been called into question and what we know today will be called tomorrow (or the day after tomorrow).
There is a huge difference between the energy of the vacuum obtained with the cosmological constant (10 power -9 joules per m3) and the energy of the vacuum with quantum electrodynamics (10 power 113 joules / m3).
There is like a problem, right?
Our advanced techniques are just beginning to detect certain variations in the oscillation of neutrinos between those who have come from the sun and those who have crossed the earth.
In particle accelerators we also observe "virtual" particles which appear and disappear as dry, ditto with lasers ...
In short, many things suggest an "energy field" that interacts with matter.
Fortunately, I'm not the only one to think so ...
More than 70 years ago, V. Schauberger had already integrated it and clarified that it is through the particular interactions within the vortices that we can benefit.
It is so difficult to envisage or it challenges our vision a little too much ...
cordially