by Did67 » 24/05/11, 08:29
And presto, let's go again !!!
Is it so hard to admit that:
a) we can have as much comfort by consuming less (what is the advantage of a light that we leave on - except to dispense with the effort of turning it off! What is the advantage of leaving so much What is the point of high-consumption devices when there are A +++?)
b) we can produce: PV, wind turbines, micro-power plants, etc ... Not all of them. But we are a number. How does that bother?
c) we can add all the solutions. Why oppose them? PV: yes, CESI: yes, underground storage: yes [when will u do this?]; isolate: yes; pellets: yes; wood: yes ...
If everyone takes one or two measurements [they have a choice! Why this idea of "unique ecological thinking"?], It is possible to reduce dependence on EdF / TotalFinaElf by 25% without any suffering. Just an effort [turn off, buy A +++, invest 17 in PV rather than buying this or that, etc ...] ... And with that, we can shut down our old nuclear power plants right away ... And afterwards, we can progress on "heavier" (banks of offshore wind turbines, anaerobic digestion / cogeneration station, BBC renovation, etc ...]
Instead, are we gonna gut each other? I leave you. Tired !
0 x