Using the internal search engine: search.php
We got a lot of results: googlesearch? q = battery
And above all we find this:
electricity-electronics-computing / life-time-of-a-battery-t5503.html
Battery performance
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79364
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13718
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1525
- Contact :
Re: Battery Performance
New atomic energy battery
https://www.enerzine.com/bv100-la-premi ... 47-2024-01Unlike chemical batteries such as lithium-ion batteries, atomic energy batteries are physical batteries with significantly higher energy density – 1 gram of battery is capable of storing 3 watt-hours of energy.
2 x
-
- I posted 500 messages!
- posts: 660
- Registration: 01/12/09, 00:20
- Location: R.alpes
- x 423
Re: Battery Performance
Another interesting innovation for EV and stationary storage:
See the article here: https://www.enerzine.com/harvard-surpas ... 00-2024-01
See the article here: https://www.enerzine.com/harvard-surpas ... 00-2024-01
1 x
Past habits must change,
because the future must not die.
because the future must not die.
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79364
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Re: Battery Performance
izentrop wrote:New atomic energy batteryhttps://www.enerzine.com/bv100-la-premi ... 47-2024-01Unlike chemical batteries such as lithium-ion batteries, atomic energy batteries are physical batteries with significantly higher energy density – 1 gram of battery is capable of storing 3 watt-hours of energy.
Interesting but ultra low unit power (well we can put x, y in parallel series...you already need quite a lot, 100, to obtain 000W continuously or 10*10x3600 = 24 Joules per day)
It generates energy every second, producing 8,64 joules of energy per day and 3 joules per year.
3 Joules per year over 153 years is 50 joules…or 157 wh…and not 650…
It reminds me of NASA plutonium batteries...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Battery Performance
izentrop wrote:New atomic energy batteryhttps://www.enerzine.com/bv100-la-premi ... 47-2024-01Unlike chemical batteries such as lithium-ion batteries, atomic energy batteries are physical batteries with significantly higher energy density – 1 gram of battery is capable of storing 3 watt-hours of energy.
There is still progress to be made. I will actually need a batch of 40 million to run the dishwasher + the washing machine, or 45 m³.
But the intention is good. β- radiation is not very bad, and what's more, they are ready-to-use electrons! It remained to find out how to recover them without going through thermal, and now it seems that they have found the trick.
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13718
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1525
- Contact :
Re: Battery Performance
Perhaps an error of interpretation...Christophe wrote:Interesting but ultra low unit power (well we can put x, y in parallel series...you already need quite a lot, 100, to obtain 000W continuously or 10*10x3600 = 24 Joules per day)izentrop wrote:New atomic energy batteryhttps://www.enerzine.com/bv100-la-premi ... 47-2024-01Unlike chemical batteries such as lithium-ion batteries, atomic energy batteries are physical batteries with significantly higher energy density – 1 gram of battery is capable of storing 3 watt-hours of energy.
It generates energy every second, producing 8,64 joules of energy per day and 3 joules per year.
3 Joules per year over 153 years is 50 joules…or 157 wh…and not 650…
It reminds me of NASA plutonium batteries...
On the manufacturer's website
https://www.betavolt.tech/359485-359485_645066.htmlZhang Wei, president and CEO of Betavolt, said the first product the company will launch is the BV100, which is the world's first nuclear battery to be mass-produced, with a power of 100 microwatts, a voltage of 3 V and a volume of 15 x 15 x 5 cubic millimeters, which is smaller than a coin.
Nuclear batteries produce 8,64 joules per day and 3 joules per year
If we stick to the characteristics of the BV100 and not what concerns nuclear batteries in general, it produces 2.4 Wh/day and over 50 years: 43,8 kWh.
It's more of a battery since it doesn't recharge.
For the rest, the translation is messing up
the energy density is more than 10 times that of ternary lithium batteries, and it can store 3 Haowah in a 300 gram battery
0 x
Re: Battery Performance
In the series of new features (good if we consider that a publication date of the article in November 2023 is still new), I just saw this:
https://www.geo.fr/environnement/pourquoi-nouvelle-batterie-sodium-ion-northvolt-white-prussian-carbone-pourrait-chambouler-secteur-vehicules-electriques-217629
A battery in which rare metals are replaced by sodium, which would solve the problems linked to them. They could, if their development continues on the right track, prove interesting for the electric mobility sector
Now to see what it looks like in reality
https://www.geo.fr/environnement/pourquoi-nouvelle-batterie-sodium-ion-northvolt-white-prussian-carbone-pourrait-chambouler-secteur-vehicules-electriques-217629
A battery in which rare metals are replaced by sodium, which would solve the problems linked to them. They could, if their development continues on the right track, prove interesting for the electric mobility sector
Now to see what it looks like in reality
1 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79364
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Re: Battery Performance
izentrop wrote:Perhaps an error of interpretation...Christophe wrote:Interesting but ultra low unit power (well we can put x, y in parallel series...you already need quite a lot, 100, to obtain 000W continuously or 10*10x3600 = 24 Joules per day)izentrop wrote:New atomic energy battery https://www.enerzine.com/bv100-la-premi ... 47-2024-01
It generates energy every second, producing 8,64 joules of energy per day and 3 joules per year.
3 Joules per year over 153 years is 50 joules…or 157 wh…and not 650…
It reminds me of NASA plutonium batteries...
On the manufacturer's websitehttps://www.betavolt.tech/359485-359485_645066.htmlZhang Wei, president and CEO of Betavolt, said the first product the company will launch is the BV100, which is the world's first nuclear battery to be mass-produced, with a power of 100 microwatts, a voltage of 3 V and a volume of 15 x 15 x 5 cubic millimeters, which is smaller than a coin.
Nuclear batteries produce 8,64 joules per day and 3 joules per year
If we stick to the characteristics of the BV100 and not what concerns nuclear batteries in general, it produces 2.4 Wh/day and over 50 years: 43,8 kWh.
It's more of a battery since it doesn't recharge.
For the rest, the translation is messing upthe energy density is more than 10 times that of ternary lithium batteries, and it can store 3 Haowah in a 300 gram battery
Well no...100 microW = 1/10 of mW...that means that it takes 100 (or 000 kg if each weighs 100g) to make 1 W...
There is no worse in terms of power per mass in the world of batteries...and yes, it's not a battery, it's a cell...
1 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 4 Replies
- 4014 views
-
Last message by bidouille23
View the latest post
03/02/13, 01:25A subject posted in the forum : Hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ...
Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 122 guests