Woodcutter wrote:Do you update your post on the Z-Machine regularly? Did you try to tell Jancovici about it?
Thank you, Jean63 (happy birthday!) And Bucheron for your answers.
Update my post? What is it exactly ? Resume the post "Iter and z-machine"? To update, it would be necessary to have new information, and only the site of JPP (which is not too well seen here) gives any. I prefer to intervene, with the drawbacks that you see, when it comes to nuclear power. Putting the matter back on the table is an opportunity to pass on the little information I have to a few people.
I like to tinker and understand, but I have no knowledge of computers, physics, auto mechanics (I have never opened an engine, and what the genius handymen who animate this site say, for me, c is often Chinese), and I only "know" about the z-machine what JPP, Xudhao, Tokamac, Ligérien, Slimounet and a few others want to put on the Net (forum Futura and Hardware in particular). Some detractors have ridiculed themselves, having so far not been screwed to align a valid argument, which makes me think that the file is solid.
The information should be disseminated to the general public, forcing the mainstream press to talk about it, and the election candidates, to position themselves if they do not want to lose votes. And that funds, even modest ones, be allocated so that competent researchers can clarify the z-machine affair, and study possible civil applications.
I'm going to contact Jancovici, it's a good idea, since he writes books and has access to the media. I do not know him and I do not know if he will take the matter into account, but I will try.