bardal wrote:Bof, we know how to properly and surely solve the problem ... We know how to transmute, some sectors are quite suitable for this kind of thing ... We quite easily reduce the most troublesome waste (for the most part transuranics) by a factor of a thousand or ten thousand, producing only short-lived waste (after 300 years, there is almost nothing left); manage waste over 300 years, we know how to do it.
Icing on the cake, it does not cost, see this reports, the operation releasing as much energy as a conventional fuel ...
All of this has already been explained on this forum... is it already forgotten?
I have not forgotten anything since it seems to me to have spoken of it widely elsewhere ...
Transmuting waste is nothing new, this has been proposed in particular by Carlo Rubbia, Nobel Prize in Physics 1984.
Now the killer question: why don't we transmute the current waste?