Nuclear: the disaster that changes everything (EC France2)

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 28/04/11, 23:52

contemptuous addrelyn:
Except it's not just U235.

forget that the gadget in test and after, fat man on Nagasaki were with plutonium that we find in the MOX of Aréva:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_gadget
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_Man
and in French almost nothing once more !!
with 6,2Kg of plutonium wasted for 21Ktonne of power in TNT, in 1945, in the power stations and the picines of Fukushima, there is a lot of junk to make beautiful explosions of criticality even if they are not effective nuclear bombs !!

And that is what actually happened, despite the lies and a secret program of making nuclear bomb material at the same time, approved by the United States. !!

As pigs plutonium reveals to us, its natural propensity to make full of small nuclear explosions dispersing everything everywhere that happened in Fukushima:

Specifically, the longer the plutonium remained irradiated inside the reactor - which is necessary for high yields of the metal - the greater its content of the isotope plutonium-240. Pu-240 undergoes spontaneous fission at an appreciable rate, and that releases plenty of excess thermal neutrons. These extra neutrons implied a high probability that a gun-type bomb with plutonium would detonate too early, before a critical mass was formed, scattering the plutonium and producing a small "fizzle" of a nuclear explosion many times smaller than a full explosion. The practical result is that a simple gun-type atomic bomb (the proposed Thin Man) would not work as had been hoped.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 29/04/11, 11:43

Alain G wrote:
Addrelyn wrote:At the same time, the deep debility does not allow to understand basic technical explanations.

The report starts from the principle that nuclear power is bad, and comes to say that nuclear power is bad.


Pffff!

Obviously you [Addrelyn] work for the sector and you come here to ease the risks !!!!!!!!!


It is finally demonstrated irrefutably, by a phenomenal blunder on his part ^^:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post201180.html#201180

[Lol] : Mrgreen:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79004
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10934




by Christophe » 30/04/11, 22:18

Part 7 on youtube is truncated, there is no end.

So see it on the FR2 stream: http://info.france2.fr/complement-denqu ... brique=110
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 15940
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5162




by Remundo » 03/05/11, 17:13

see also "Mount Fuji in Red" by Akira Kurosawa.

Catastrophe film warning of the nuclear risk triggered by an uncontrollable natural risk (in this case the eruption of Mount Fuji)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_ZxTB8m ... dded#at=48

The film forces the line but already posed the real problems ... in 1990. Premonitory.
0 x
Image
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 03/05/11, 18:44

Watch the story of Mount Fuji:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeO-wbTx ... re=related
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mont_Fuji
last eruption 1707 !!
Strong and explosive with ashes to Tokyo !!


On the other hand we also have a supervolcano in Europe in addition to the one under Naples-Vesuvius in Germany very close to Koblenz which exploded in -12900, huge which would demolish all of Germany and left ashes all over Europe as nice dating layer !! !!

I put this info on:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/post201098.html#201098

It is further north of a lake Laacher See or Laach Lake (in English) near Koblenz between Cologne and Wiesbaden !!
A supervolcano is not noticed because very explosive and rarely to the point that it seems usual in relief after !!
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/read/index ... ex&svid=10
300km in diameter exploded in -12900 with ash all over Europe !!

See also for risks:
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php ... &lang=eng#
This is sobering because we can quantify the risk of receiving a large meteorite close to a km in diameter !!
Laacher See
Volcano ID: 000
Country: DEU
Location: Rhineland-Palatinate
Diameter: ~ 300 kmł
Last Eruption: ~ 12,900 years ago


Laacher See or Laach Lake (in English) is a caldera lake in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, situated close to the cities of Koblenz, Mayen (11 km), and Andernach (14 km). Just like the nearby 'Wehrer Kessel' volcano and Rieden volcano, the Laacher See volcano forms a volcanic caldera in the Eifel mountain range. It is part of the area called "East Eifel volcanic field". The great Eifel lake takes its name from the Old High German word "lacha" which in turn is derived from Latin "lacus" as English "lake". Thus the name literally means "Lake of the Lake" similar to the "Loch Lochy" in the Scottish Highlands with the same meaning. The lake lies 259 m above sea level, is 8 km in circumference, and surrounded by a ring of high hills. The water is blue, very cold and bitter to the taste. The lake has no natural outlet and so the water level changes considerably due to evaporation and rainfall conditions. On the western side lies the Benedictine monastery of Maria Laach Abbey (Abbatia Lacensis), founded in 1093 by Henry II of Laach of the House of Luxembourg, first count palatine of the Rhine who has had his castle opposite to the monastery above the eastern lakeside .

The caldera was formed after the Laacher See eruption dated to 12'900 years ago. The remaining crust collapsed into the empty magma chamber below, probably two or three days after the eruption. [4] With an estimated 6 km3 of magma erupted, this eruption was slightly larger than the 1991 eruption of Pinatubo (Philippines). The Laacher eruption concides with the onset of the abrupt Younger Dryas reglaciation, which brought renewed very cold conditions to the northern hemisphere from 12.9 to 11.6 ka. However, any relationship between this climate change and the eruption is speculative; eruptions of the size of the Laacher See eruption usually cause only short-term global cooling. Remains of this eruption can be found all over Europe and the tephra is often used for dating of sediments. A number of unique minerals can be found in the region, and quarries mine the stone as a building material. The Laacher is a potentially active volcano, caused by seismic activities and heavy thermal anomalies under the lake. Carbon dioxide gas from magma still bubbles up at the southeastern shore, and scientists believe that a new eruption could happen at any time, which, today, would be a disaster beyond all description.


The supervolcano next to Vesuvius is similar (Vesuvius is not very close !!).

You can be close to a supervolcano without knowing it !!

So all of this proves that the method of the historical reference earthquake is scientifically nonsense, because outside of history, there are many extreme past events that must be taken into account to be serious.
The Rhône-Jura-Rhin valley including Germany is a system associated with the Alps, which must have terrible earthquakes of force 9 according to the law of scale frequency versus force of earthquakes measured everywhere on earth where almost all of the seismic energy is found in the strongest earthquakes, of force 9 (more than 90%) !!
Same for the Himalayas and the Indies, 10 times more often and that's the pure madness of building nuclear power plants there, with Areva, which lies with its reference earthquakes !! (petitions to sign).
So when Clause Allégre says that France does not tremble unlike Italy, he is a lying specialist perfectly aware of his lie!
A force 8 to 9 is all the Alps and associated collapse ditches moving from a block over 300 km at 1500Km in one to three minutes of several meters.
We can say that the current seismic calm is very misleading because it indicates a blocked system which one day will drop with an appalling force.
So all of them, we play the lottery, betting that this sure and certain catastrophe sooner or later will not happen in our lifetime, by building houses, non-earthquake-resistant force 9 industries and nuclear power plants !!
Japan without earthquake-resistant constructions would have a death toll in the million range, which will be the case in Europe with an earthquake with a force greater than 7, inevitable sooner or later, which is very common in Japan !!

Quote:
it's the obsolescence of this reactor, the only one in France not to have a double hull ...

The double shell is quite illusory, in the event of a serious problem and melting of the heart, because it is only delaying to explode more strongly with a higher pressure (3 to 6 bars)
Three miles Island was miraculous that it did not explode with its hydrogen bubble !!
Fukushima proves it with its repeated explosions, but less violent than with double heart.
Nuclear power plants do not support the complete absence of cooling, a risk deemed impossible before Fukushima (proves the stupidity of our engineers), a possibility that will always exist, despite the contrary claims !! !!
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 258 guests