ITER = DANGER, petition letter

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 16/11/11, 18:29

amusing:
But if the French give up, and the Americans find it in 1, 5 or 10 years and there is a chance in 1 billion.
Politically, can they take the risk,

this behavior of Panurge sheep rushing into the abyss:
I'm going there because the boyfriend is going for it !!

In addition, the Americans did not get started on ITER with 15 billion !!!
Why ?????
They do not believe it and will not put this amount !!!
How many original discoveries would be possible with research on a myriad of possibilities overlooked with this pharaonic sum ???
In particular, even another much more clever solution is possible, including cold fusion, Rossi and others !!
0 x
jam
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 395
Registration: 17/12/07, 21:53
x 27




by jam » 17/11/11, 04:34

avoid the disturbance.
The meeting with the CEA people did not take place, they refused to introduce themselves. Only the European deputy was there. A broadcast soon on the JPP website.
0 x
clasou
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 553
Registration: 05/05/08, 11:33




by clasou » 17/11/11, 06:18

It is not a question of panurge, but it is a war for the power of the future, because at this level there it is not even any more question of competing society but of states.
Look what happened between Boeing and Airbus.
Now will find 'it or not will it be the fusion of x and y or other no idea.
So at this level, what is this 15 billion, if you do not make advance by another,
Because in this little game just the fact of following dice forces your competitor to overbid, until one preferred to throw in the towel and the other follows.
But we can also talk about an orbital station, the current European system competing with gps.
for information the usa has just crossed the 15 000 billion debt mark.

I remind that I am anti, But the world economy does not care.
a + claude
0 x
clasou
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 553
Registration: 05/05/08, 11:33




by clasou » 17/11/11, 06:20

Ah I forgot the ps who modified the agreement made with eelv, on the mox sector follows a intervention from aréva, and their info on the future of the 14 people concerned, professional taxes, export contracts .........
a + claude
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 17/11/11, 10:41

clasou wrote:So at this level, what is this 15 billion, if you don't get another lead
As long as you invest $ 15 billion, you might as well spend it on a viable project. If the others throw money out the window by financing a project that goes into the wall, free to them, there is no reason to do the same.

jam wrote:avoid the disturbance.
The meeting with the CEA people did not take place, they refused to introduce themselves. Only the European deputy was there. A broadcast soon on the JPP website.
Thank you for the info. Once again, the people from CEA marched. Apparently, they do not have a clear conscience.
Last edited by Cuicui the 17 / 11 / 11, 10: 50, 2 edited once.
0 x
clasou
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 553
Registration: 05/05/08, 11:33




by clasou » 17/11/11, 10:54

Yes it is, but I think there is only if China, India, Pakistan,
nnoncént that they are going to get out of nuclear power, which politicians might see differently.
But as long as the big potential customers are there, they will not leave their market.
a + claude
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 18/11/11, 16:37

A video of the interview of physicist Jean-Pierre Petit and Green MEP Michèle Rivasi about ITER.
http://www.enquete-debat.fr/archives/mi ... opos-diter
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 18/11/11, 18:29

Cédric Reux was not authorized to explain his thesis with JPP, who noted a scientific fact in his thesis of uncontrollable instabilities, because, with the scientific facts of his thesis, he would "spit in the soup '" of the CEA and would find himself discarded, forever heretical, like others !!
In fact it is an admission that nuclear can only exist in secrecy and concealment !!!

In any case, ITER is the same as making an engine using only unstable liquid dynamite, that is to say uncontrollable explosions and instabilities.
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16119
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5240




by Remundo » 19/11/11, 12:01

Cuicui wrote:A video of the interview of physicist Jean-Pierre Petit and Green MEP Michèle Rivasi about ITER.
http://www.enquete-debat.fr/archives/mi ... opos-diter

Nice media hit from Jean Pierre Petit ...

It is fortunate that an influential MP with a minimum of scientific background is enlightened on the (im) relevance of ITER

Total blackout of the CEA; the "modest doctoral student", caught in the trap of the instability control of the ITER plasma that he studies in his thesis, hides directly behind Bernard Bigot, Grand Manitou of the CEA.

Which locks the subject by imposing projects as risky as the related budgets are colossal, in the purest French nucleocrat tradition.
Thank you for the info. Once again, the people from CEA marched. Apparently, they do not have a clear conscience.

And also quiet science. It has worked for them for 60 years.

@+
0 x
Image

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 254 guests