Inevitable: The nuclear accident TV movie in France

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
Gregconstruct
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1781
Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
Location: Amay Belgium




by Gregconstruct » 25/11/08, 19:55

Jonule, reread everything I wrote slowly and without translating in your own way.

Whatever happens, for me, nuclear is shit !!!!!

I never said that in France or in Belgium we were in total security. I only said that the operating principle of the RBMKs of the former USSR and that the French and Belgian PWRs were reactors with completely different operating principles and equally different security systems.
This means that we cannot know of an accident of the same type as Chernobyle.
I of course did not say that it was not possible to have an accident with us !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 26/11/08, 11:28

well, let's take the time to understand each other then ;-)
you know I try not to let anything pass, confusions or amalgams which end up concluding nuclear, it's a way of translating as you say;
Anyway, I understood your message, the power stations in Russia do not have the same security as in France, ok I understood; ditto in France little chance that we have a Chernobyl, ok!

but i was just saying: even with security on our power stations, those of neighboring countries like russia are enough to send us radioactive clouds. example, Chernobyl precisely. I imagine the state of the eastern power plants and their maintenance systems, leaks etc ... are they all made public? I doubt;

the wind will carry us all, we are little.
0 x
C moa
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 704
Registration: 08/08/08, 09:49
Location: Algiers
x 9




by C moa » 26/11/08, 18:21

Just as a reminder, Chernobyl is in Ukraine : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Gregconstruct
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1781
Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
Location: Amay Belgium




by Gregconstruct » 26/11/08, 18:23

Totally agree Jonule!

Bingo, we understood each other and we are going in the same direction : Mrgreen:
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!
User avatar
delnoram
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 1322
Registration: 27/08/05, 22:14
Location: Mâcon-Tournus
x 2




by delnoram » 26/11/08, 20:07

jonule wrote: ditto in france little chance we have a Chernobyl, ok!


Ben Jonule, you are very pessimistic at once : Shock:
: Mrgreen:
0 x
"Thinking should not it be taught in school rather than to make learning by heart the facts that are not all proven?"
"It's not because they are likely to be wrong they are right!" (Coluche)
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 27/11/08, 11:00

:D


Chernobyl no, but Tricastin if! ......
this year i will stop ordering from the cote du rhône ...... :|
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6980
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2905




by gegyx » 16/02/09, 16:31

Everything becomes possible ...

Even extremely rare hypotheses:

Last week, 2 American and Russian satellites met and annihilated in space.

In early February, two nuclear reactors collided 20 leagues under the sea.
(The intercontinental missiles remained wise ...)

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/2/20090216/tfr ... 6f567.html

Whatever ! : Evil:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11042




by Christophe » 16/02/09, 16:35

Boaf don't worry, they were in stealth mode so not very fast ... the collision did not have to do much damage ...I am more "afraid" of the 1st Russian nuclear submarines which rot in the barent sea (at the bottom or in the port) ... There are also some American nuclear buildings that have sunk here or there ...

Generally it is at the ascent (emergency or not) that the submarines strike ships: when it is big, oil tanker for example it has already happened, it is not too serious (for the boat) but with trawler often dies there ...

As it is the army (not necessarily legitimate in the territory of impact), families can always wait for explanations ...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79323
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11042




by Christophe » 16/02/09, 19:12

Recovery attempt : Evil:

What does the nuclear lobby do in an army exercise?

Really anything ... : Shock:

They'd better raise money to clean up the Barents Sea instead of telling such nonsense ...

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mer_de_Barents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-159

By 0300 the wreck had sunk in the Barents Sea, 238 meters down, with nine of her crew and 800 kilograms of spent nuclear fuel containing some 20 petabecquerels (600 kilocuries) of radioactivity.


Did you see the face of the thing (before it sank with 800 kg of nuclear waste)?

Image
I don't care!
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14141
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 19/02/09, 23:20

Christophe wrote:
What does the nuclear lobby do in an army exercise?
Really anything ... : Shock:


They may be talking bullshit, but somewhere, it's vigilance. Whether it is the English or the French, when it comes to the activities of the army, it is always the language of wood. With us it is called "the great mute". Even if the submarine is gutted from end to end and has lost half of its nuclear charges at the bottom of the water, the only possible language is "Everything is going very well Madame la Marquise". As a reminder, the Chernobyl cloud has stopped at our borders ...: Evil:

They better raise money to clean up the Barents Sea ...

+100. These bands of big police nazes who have gotten too used to sailing on sight, will wait until the access is so contaminated that it will cost 10 times or 100 times the setting to depollute this me..e and by sacrificing it again more staff. : Evil: They don't care, it's not them personally who will. They will just put chrysanthemums on some graves saying that these men sacrificed themselves for the nation ...
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 215 guests