Historical earnings and oil revenues to between 1920 2006

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 14/12/06, 21:53

Well, here are some additional curves:

Historical 2:

1920 to 2006
Image

1970 to 2006
Image

Cumulative HT oil revenue
Image

These $ 40 billion (probably as much by 000) are to be compared to the "small" $ 2050 billion of the Stern report ...Do you understand PKOI DO NOT DO NOTHING?

And again, we are EXCLUDING TAX ... and if we take the complete creation of wealth from oil, we can largely multiply this figure by 20 to 30 (in other words: $ 1 of oil creates $ 20 of " wealth "in the GDP sense of the term of course ...) ...
0 x
User avatar
Woodcutter
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4731
Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
x 2




by Woodcutter » 14/12/06, 22:12

Poor oil companies, what a hard crisis than that of the early 80 ... : Cry:
Fortunately we have come back ...
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 14/12/06, 22:15

Ben and I say: thank you Bush ... he has so damn shit that the barrel exploded :)

Besides, it's my sarcastic proposition on the forum of the Covenant :D

http://forum.pacte-ecologique-2007.org/ ... php?id=282
0 x
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 14/12/06, 22:38

Hello,
Could we have a crude oil production curve?
profits are fine if they increase the price it follows, but it would be interesting to know if we pump more basement?

Andre
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 14/12/06, 22:42

Of course André, it happens immediately!

In the meantime, you can look at this: https://www.econologie.com/la-consommati ... -3282.html

Edit: here is André, https://www.econologie.com/forums/evolution- ... t2761.html
0 x
hug
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 65
Registration: 10/12/06, 17:56




by hug » 14/12/06, 23:51



Which shows, as you say yourself "A new source does not replace another: the consumption of coal is 6 times greater in the year 2000 than in 1900 ..."

This explains why Jancovici's position that it is important to reduce the consumption of fossil resources is the only good practice.

The only renewable energy is energy saving.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 17/12/06, 12:48

hug wrote:This explains why Jancovici's position that it is important to reduce the consumption of fossil resources is the only good practice.

The only renewable energy is energy saving.


Right, you have to "fight" on all fronts at the same time ... substitutes for fossils and parsimony ...

The problem is that in 2 cases, the financial calculation is done without taking into account the cost of the damage of the greenhouse effect ...

Now even the 5500 Billions Stern report, not only are challenged (forcing down by most manufacturers) but especially pale compared to 40 000 Billion HT that only oil has already brought ... while he is not the only one responsible for global warming ...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 22/12/06, 12:14

Here, the full article has been written:
https://www.econologie.com/l-argent-du-p ... -3297.html

News: https://www.econologie.com/40-000-millia ... -3299.html

résumé:
https://www.econologie.com/le-cumul-des- ... -3298.html

For any remark or comment, thank you for doing them here :)
Thank you
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 29/09/09, 20:21

Global GDP in 2008: 60100 billion $
source: the World Bank: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNA ... 19,00.html

Oil production 84 Million barrels per day for 365 days, and taking the current price of 70 $ a barrel, it makes

84 million * 365 * 70 dollars, or 2146 billion $

the oil turnover calculated in this way is 2146 / 60100 = 3.57% of world GDP.

I wrote turnover, it does not mean net gain.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 29/09/09, 20:27

+ taxes = result * 3 : Cheesy:

In short we tate the 10% of world GDP just on the sale of oil ...
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 204 guests