Fukushima nuclear disaster: potential evacuation from Tokyo (35 million inhabitants)Bonjour à tous
I hesitated for a few weeks before sending you the information below, concerning the nuclear disaster of Fukushima in Japan, not wanting to put too many dark notes for the next few years. But, ultimately, I don't think the ostrich head-in-the-sand policy is appropriate, because we have important decisions to make about the future of nuclear power plants, and you can't get away from it.
First, in his latest information video (March 25, 2012), Arnie Gundersen, a world renowned specialist in the field of nuclear power plants, tells us that he went to Japan in February 2012, and took advantage of it. to collect 5 soil samples in Tokyo, at various locations. Upon his return home to the United States, he had them analyzed and all of these samples would be considered nuclear waste in his country, and should be sent to Texas for processing. See
http://www.fairewinds.com/fukushimaThen, it should not be forgotten that a year ago already the Japanese authorities recommended to the population of Tokyo not to use tap water for children, because the threshold of radioactivity was too high. See
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20 ... ns-110323/To "avoid legal problems" the Japanese government simply increased the radiation thresholds considered safe for people!?!
Now, what you need to know is that this contamination is linked to the reactors of the Fukushima power station, whose fuel rods are contained in closed 15 cm steel enclosures. We now know that the lack of water in 3 of the reactors melted their hearts and produced a lot of hydrogen (by thermal decomposition of the water) which caused the explosions that we know when demolishing buildings, as well than the huge cranes (overhead cranes) on their ceilings, when their function was to remove and move the spent fuel rods to store them in swimming pools (one per reactor).
However, the amount of nuclear fuel in these pools is ten times greater than that of reactors, after more than 30 years of operation of power plants, and all nuclear waste is there, including plutonium, including a few millionths of a gram ingested is enough to give deadly cancer (there are tons)!
What worries Arnie Gundersen and many other world nuclear specialists is precisely what can happen with the fuel stored in swimming pools. The reactor 4 pool, in particular, is in very poor condition and steel pillars had to be installed to prevent it from collapsing (the pools are at the top of the buildings). If an earthquake of magnitude 7 or more occurs, there is a good chance that this pool will collapse or have a major breach that empties its water. And geological experts know that the chances of having such an earthquake are very great over a horizon of a few years. Japan is located on the Pacific Ring of Fire.
If such damage were to happen to this pool or another, the spent fuel rods no longer cooled would ignite, sending far greater quantities of radioactive elements into the environment than we have known. till today. It should not be forgotten that swimming pools are in the open air, and do not have a thick steel enclosure to contain them, as is the case for reactors. And as it would be impossible for all personnel to approach, due to the too intense radioactivity, there is a good chance that the other pools at the Fukushima site will do the same, being left abandoned.
In the event that a single pool empties of its water, and its fuel is projected into the environment, IT SHOULD EVACUATE TOKYO (35 million inhabitants). And if all the pools pass by, it is the whole of Japan that should be evacuated !!!!!!
According to experts, if such an event were to occur, the survival of the human race and many animals is at stake. See
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... &aid=30207Let us hope that the Japanese authorities will have enough humility to ask for the help of the best independent world experts and to remove the management of this disaster from TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Corporation) which is in conflict of interest in this case and is trying to cover up the gravity of the situation as much as possible.
So if some of you were still hesitant about the future of the Gentilly 2 nuclear power plant, the only one in Quebec, which supplies less than 2% of our electricity, then we are in surplus for the next 10 years , you should no longer hesitate to ask loudly for its CLOSURE.
Just play the sorcerer's apprentice! Let's quickly return to clean renewable energy.
Sincerely
Pierre Langlois, Ph.D.
Physicist: consultant / author