Why dismantle nuclear power plants?

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14141
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 01/05/11, 15:14

Obamot wrote:The masquerade of the nuke continues, but I look forward to reading the next absurdities of the "grilled commercial attaché" of the nuclear industry and his "agent", since he made us understand that they have so many "superior" interests to defend in this industry ...


+1 : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 28/07/11, 21:14

Nuclear: green light to dismantle Brennilis

The 28 July 2011

EDF has obtained authorization to proceed with the partial dismantling of the Brennilis nuclear power plant. This is what is meant by a Prime Minister's decree published this Thursday July 28 in the Official Journal.

The Monts d'Arrée power station, the oldest nuclear power plant in France, will see its dismantling resume. Excluding reactor block. A recovery which follows the cancellation by the Council of State of the decision to completely dismantle taken in June 2007.

The new text specifies in particular the list of authorized operations, including the dismantling of heat exchangers, possible remediation and dismantling of the structures of the effluent treatment station (STE). As well as the remediation of the land underlying the STE, the dismantling of the waste shed.

All authorized operations must be carried out within 5 years, according to the decree. The text also specifies that an assessment of the operation must be provided to the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) "six months following the end of the heat exchanger dismantling operations".

Throughout the operations, the operator takes the necessary measures to communicate regular information to local populations, communities and the local information commission (CLI), in particular. In particular on the progress and planning of operations, on the transport of waste, on the measures taken in terms of protection of workers and the environment, according to the decree.

For the total dismantling of this plant, EDF will have to file before December 31, 2011, an authorization request file "in which it justifies the dismantling strategy adopted", underlines the decree.

http://www.usinenouvelle.com/article/nu ... is.N156415

Now we will have to extend the hundreds of millions of €
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79353
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11059




by Christophe » 28/07/11, 21:50

Image
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 16162
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5259




by Remundo » 28/07/11, 21:53

Nuclear is clean : Arrowl: Image : Arrow: nuclear is cheap
0 x
Image
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 29/07/11, 21:40

Indulge.

Brazil. Central visits in September

July 20, 2011 letelegramme.com

On September 17 and 18, the Brennilis nuclear power plant site will once again welcome the public during EDF Electric Industry Days. Visitors (from 12 years old) will discover the works already carried out as well as the deconstruction project to come. Prior registration is required, as well as a valid ID. Registration on edf.com until August 19 last deadline.


http://www.letelegramme.com/ig/generale ... 375793.php
0 x
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7




by elephant » 01/08/11, 17:08

Christopher said:

new wind projects must fund their dismantling on blocked account for 20 years!


Trade, all that! When we see that a Twingo (mechanical) holds 17 years, that an electronic alarm (powered 24 hours a day) can hold 24 years, even 26, we think that they have been handed off junk. .and when you see the lifespan of some planes.

The pylon and its base, normally maintained, should be able to last 30 or 40 years
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 01/08/11, 21:29

Chooz A, full-scale nuclear dismantling test.
It is one of the first experiences of its kind in Europe, which will enter a decisive phase


lesechos.be August 10, 2010.

In the French Ardennes, a stone's throw from the Belgian border, the Chooz B nuclear power plant continues to produce electricity. That of Chooz A, on the other hand, is being dismantled. It was one of the first experiments of this type in Europe, all the more important since the Chooz A reactor, operated from 1967 to 1991, was of the same type as those currently in operation in France and Belgium.

Thanks to this full-scale test, EDF officials hope to refine their strategy to "deconstruct", as they prefer to say, the 58 French reactors in operation. Because of the extension of the power plants or not, nuclear reactors end up reaching retirement age: in the European Union, alongside the 145 reactors still operational, 74 are already closed.

Even if Electrabel had drawing rights on this power station, it is not associated with the dismantling process, which is the exclusive responsibility of the operator, EDF.

Around a hundred people, mostly subcontractors, work on the site, which is set up in a network of caves, on the hill overlooking the Meuse, instead of the classic concrete buildings of other nuclear power plants. The places show their age, with old-fashioned locker rooms where a sign forbids not only to eat, but also "to urinate and defecate".

To enter the nuclear zone, you have to strip naked, put on gloves, shoes, cap and special suit, and equip yourself with an oxygen system and a Geiger counter. A secure airlock provides access to the galleries, where the air pressure is kept lower than normal, to avoid any leakage in the event of an incident.

The uranium that was used as fuel was evacuated, and the circuits drained. Most of the cables, piping or pumps that could be removed were removed. Painted signals distinguish the different categories of material: blue = no danger, green = radioactive, red = must remain. When radioactive material is cut, hermetic airlocks are installed, in which men work in ventilated suits.

Despite all these precautions, the French nuclear safety authority, ASN, which regularly carries out inspections, is critical of the way in which the work is carried out. "ASN expects greater rigor from the licensee, in particular in the field of radiation protection where several significant events were declared during 2009", she wrote in its latest annual report. And in a letter of February 23, she mentions "several deviations" noted by its inspectors and calls for corrective measures.

"We take maximum precautions, and we have never had any incident," says Pascal Dziopa, works director at Chooz A. As soon as a situation does not correspond to what was planned, the workers are instructed to 'stop, and further investigations are being carried out. "

By the end of the year, the site will enter a decisive phase, with the dismantling of the four steam generators of devices of several tens of tons each, which will be soaked in a chemical bath to try to reduce their radioactivity, a first which, if successful, will reduce the tonnage of highly radioactive waste to be stored by the same amount.

Then, it will be the most delicate, the reactor vessel, a job that EDF will entrust to the Americans of Westinghouse, who originally supplied the machine.

EDF, which manages the entire French nuclear fleet, has opted for "immediate deconstruction" - even if the process takes 25 to 30 years. Other countries, such as the Netherlands or the Czech Republic, have chosen to postpone operations for several decades to benefit from the natural decrease in radioactivity. "We want to avoid passing on this problem to future generations, and benefit from the knowledge of those who installed these reactors", explains Alain Ensuque, director of Ciden, the engineering center created by EDF to manage the dismantling of its power plants, which employs 550 people, including around twenty in Chooz A. The testimony of these nuclear pioneers, now at least sixty years old, can be invaluable, while the documents on the way in which the plant was built are not always classified very effectively. EDF also stresses that the experience acquired during decommissioning can improve the design and maintenance of new power plants.

The French energy company refuses to communicate precisely on the costs of dismantling plant by plant. It indicates a total cost of 2 billion euros for the nine reactors currently in the "deconstruction" phase although the work at Brennilis, in Finistère, would have already cost 482 million while the most delicate phase has not yet started. "The first power stations are more expensive to deconstruct, because we are carrying out research there which will benefit the following ones", argues Ensuque.

These nine plants will produce nearly one million tonnes of waste, of which more than 80% is conventional waste. Of the remaining 185.000 tonnes, the weakest radioactive waste is sent to Morvilliers and Soulaines (Aube). The others will wait at the Bugey power plant site in Ain for Andra, the authority in this area, to open a final storage site.


http://www.lecho.be/actualite/entrepris ... .art?ckc=1
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 01/08/11, 21:45

Dismantling is very nice, but to put all these radioactive materials where? Until this issue is resolved, it is impossible to talk about dismantling, let alone its cost! Which will depend on the time required to monitor ... waste ...

Because it is not very complicated to understand that it will be necessary to wait until the radioactivity disappears. And the solution is not to bury the waste, it does not solve the problem ... (Many states have already given up, including Russia) .. Because monitoring sites at a cost, and that we do not think of groundwater, nor of water infiltration (earthquakes are there to remind us that the earth's crust is constantly and totally unpredictably moving).

In short, for the existing, it is already too late, it will remain on our hands for hundreds of years, if not millions.

So dismantling is one thing, but it would be better to stop the costs ... By leaving nuclear power. This is what would cost the least in the long run.
0 x
User avatar
nlc
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2751
Registration: 10/11/05, 14:39
Location: Nantes




by nlc » 01/08/11, 21:54

moinsdewatt wrote:[...]
About a hundred people, for most subcontractors, [...]


well then : Mrgreen:
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 14/09/11, 21:06

Usine Nouvelle of 01 Sept 2011 about the resumption of activity of the Brennilis dementing.

Image

Image

Edit by Christophe: captures put on our host (please try to do it next time thank you)
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Bing [Bot] and 342 guests