Nuclear on alert on France3

[Flytox]

So the French will wonder how they could have voted for nuclear power ??

As far as I know, we have never been consulted and even less informed of the dangerousness before installation. After, once installed their weapon of mass destruction for metropolitan use and with random trigger, they made sure to make us believe that it was completely harmless, for our economic and even ecological good.

If we had to name the "Irresponsibles Awards" ........

[sen-no-sen]

You could award one to our dear (€€€ $) president!
Reminder of the facts: while he occupied the post of Minister of Industry (2004), he (and Areva) validated the decision to continue on the launch of all nuclear (80%), while another decision proposed 50/50 (50% nuclear / 50% miscellaneous (renewable energy + a little thermal).
"Normally" this decision should have been taken by French citizens ... normally ...
But hey, democracy is like the snow panther, endangered ...

[netshaman]

I read in a scientific journal one day that man was distinguished from the rest of animal species by the fact that he was the only one to anticipate the future ...

Would we have lied without knowing it of our own free will?

[dedeleco]

Most accidents are limited geographically and in time, but nuclear power instantly requires the permanent evacuation, for centuries and millennia, in less than a day, of an entire region and pollutes the entire earth for at least 30000 years (plutonium) .
http://users.skynet.be/mauriceandre/
http://users.skynet.be/mauriceandre/bombeatomique.htm
http://users.skynet.be/mauriceandre/ra-rn.htm
http://users.skynet.be/mauriceandre/ray.htm

To read, because the pseudo specialists lie and suffocate the real specialists that nobody reads.

[Christophe]

I am frightened by the almost 'absence of reactions on econologie.com on this problem of the major nuclear risk !!!!
Like the French, and the ostriches, we refuse to face this real risk in the face !!

Uh objection, we still have a lot of subjects that evoke this, for example I really liked the documentary RAS on subcontracting and human resources in the nuke: https://www.econologie.com/forums/edf-et-la- ... t7513.html

See the results on the keyword nuclear

Is the documentary on the subject available somewhere on the net? I missed it on TV ...

I did find that though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rftJRas5MCw

It's an exercise ok but the dust masks of the corner store is a joke?

See also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxD44HO8dNQi the biggest bomb of all time: Russian Tsar of 57 MegaTonnes about 2600 times Hiroshima ...

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

[bfx]

Hi,
no masks it's no joke ... Enough, given the scope of the exercise (no explosion, reactor fusion yet), it's just to avoid ingesting dust with alpha ptis or beta which could wander in the dust brought back by the guys who are decontaminated and by the 4 fictitious irradiated.

[dedeleco]

Christophe notices

Uh objection, we still have a lot of subjects that evoke this, for example I really liked the documentary RAS on subcontracting and human resources in the nuke

I note that it is true you have a lot of topics on nuclear.
But none of them highlights the gravity of a Chernobyl and dismantles the lie of nuclear power which hides that nuclear power must be infallible which humanly is impossible, and that therefore a new Chernobyl will occur sooner or later, causing evacuation in less than one day a whole region with lots of people never to return !!!
Never will global warming, whatever its cause, CO2 or other, be as brutal in a day, leaving generations to realize it unless the sea is already above as for scynthia !!!
This documentary shows the exploitation of workers by nuclear "slavers" on behalf of EDF, who are sent "green" as soon as their dose reaches the legal limit measured, not always exactly the real dose !!
They went on strike last year so much that EDF power stations missed the call this winter !!!
But the supporters of nuclear respond: look in the coal mines it's worse, there have been many more deaths in our country in the past than with nuclear and now in China by silicosis and accidents !!!!
They do not hesitate to write that nuclear is perfectly safer than coal !!!
They forget that the dead are delayed for 30 years, almost inseparable from natural deaths, whereas silicosis cannot be attributed to natural death !!!

EPR: the future Chernobyl page 1
Christophe Posted on: Sun, 16 Apr 2006, 12:21 Post subject:
Concrete proposal to all ANTI NUCLEAR: ...
will no longer finance (or bcp less) the nuclear power against which you are fighting so much ... (a little paradoxical as a behavior, right?) and will therefore be at peace with your conscience .....
... stop funding them and they will die .... sooner or later ......

But you forget: don't vote any more for those who develop nuclear power !!!
Finally for the cost of nuclear power we will have to pay full price with waste and an inevitable Chernobyl if nuclear power continues and accelerates !!!!
You are right, we should save to pay this catastrophic cost.
Chernobyl collapsed the USSR and the economy of France (or any other country) will do the following !!
No insurance will suffice !!!

Finally read very disturbing the pacifist Obama: Final destination Iran?
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/worl ... -1.1013151

[Remundo]

Hello everyone,

Could we have found Jonule's successor?

Because currently, joining SDN requires Surviving In the Dark.

There is no alternative energy infrastructure. The electric mix is ​​totally phagocised by nuclear power. The domestic heating is rotted with electric convectors ...

Worse, the political consensus is almost total on nuclear. There is hardly that the extreme ecologists who grumble.

The "central" problem of nuclear ... is not the power plants, but the diffusion of radionuclides during the chain of transformation of the ore, of its enrichment then storage of various wastes, including the most bulky, the HAVL and those resulting from dismantling (will it take place elsewhere? ... a remedy worse than the disease) of the power stations.

Chernobyl is a huge disaster, but it is agitated like a scarecrow by the very people who think they are fighting against nuclear power.

The authorities like because it obscures the main part of the problem, which I would like to reiterate again, relates to the life cycle of combustible materials and not to the boiler.

[jlt22]

How are we going to dismantle the big nuclear power plants.
The very small (70 MW) from Brittany, arrested in 1985, is still waiting for a solution that does not come.

[/ Url] http://seaus.free.fr/spip.php?article171 [Url]

The price of nuclear electricity that we are paying at the moment is far from reflecting the real cost price.
The cost of dismantling is not understood, since unknown.

Our grandchildren are therefore ordered to pay the second part of the bill.

[Flytox]

There is no alternative energy infrastructure. The electric mix is ​​totally phagocised by nuclear power. The domestic heating is rotted with electric convectors ...

It is not because we are hand and foot tied by the political lobbyist nuke maffia that we should not try to get out of it. Of course this cannot be done without breaking the piggy bank and in 5 minutes ...

Worse, the political consensus is almost total on nuclear. There is hardly that the extreme ecologists who grumble.

This lobby really has a lot of money to be able to buy almost all the reluctance ....

The "central" problem of nuclear ... is not the power plants, but the diffusion of radionuclides during the chain of transformation of the ore, of its enrichment then storage of various wastes, including the most bulky, the HAVL and those resulting from dismantling (will it take place elsewhere? ... a remedy worse than the disease) of the power stations.

Effectively, this leaves us the "choice" between letting the risks multiply with the number of these randomly triggered bombs which kill relatively quickly (explosion + atmospheric dissemination + generalized radioactive fallout) et leave the sneaky trap to our future generations .... it's a Cornelian choice ...