http://www.francois-roddier.fr/?p=43Regarding the article cited:
In a major article published in 2000 (1), two American cancer experts, Douglas Hanahan and Robert A. Weinberg describe the characteristic signs of cancerous tissue. This article is the subject of a special page on Wikipedia. The authors list six distinctive signs that are thought to add a seventh today. These characteristic signs can be easily transposed to human societies. We are struck by how much they apply to the current liberal societies. this similarity between the development of cancers and that of our societies is indeed striking and especially since the explosion of these pathologies having never existed in such proportions in the near or distant past.
Interestingly too, one should look at how to deal with the subject in medicine and in a similar way in politics which precisely shapes societies.
So, it would be good to focus not on how to deal with this plague, but on why it has grown so much and therefore how to be able to apply to society as to tumors, the same processes intended to reduce and ultimately eliminate this pathology.
Unfortunately, our civil or medical society wanted to resolve the effects without really tackling the causes.
Warburg, quoted, had noticed that cancer cells had an enormous energy need, and thus in sugar, and, according to him, the best way to exhaust them was to close the tap which supplied them and at the same time the fight would stop for lack of stewardship. It was simple in appearance!
But was it the sugar that had to be questioned because the rest of the body had this same need and its removal (assuming it was possible), would have caused the death of the patient. And above all: why had not all previous generations developed these pathologies in the same proportions, when physiologically and therefore biologically humans have not changed in a few decades? Mystery and gum balls!
Warburg ended up noticing that it was not the complex sugars, which we find in our usual foods, that were the cause, but precisely the industrial sugars devitalized by various physical and chemical processes. So, he notices cane sugar,
unrefined, did not feed these anarchic cells.
He also realized that:
According to Warburg, the induction of an acidification state in the body is incompatible with the metabolism of cancer cells3.This last point is indeed fundamental in the development of cancers and particularly that of children who are usually free (before excessive industrialization in the food and medical fields) of this pathology which now strikes more and more soon, even infants. Why ?
Before the explosion of modern methods of care, nature produced in all children periods of intense fever characteristic of these childhood illnesses (which, poorly channeled, can become pathogenic), and these fevers served to acidify the organism by burning also the toxins accumulated in it. The excessive use of anti-febrifuges,
vaccines that prevent these diseases from being expressed, stopped these salutary reactions and the humoral basification, favorable to the development of cancers is installed, almost permanently from where these explosions of childhood cancers in addition to those of adults. But who consumes, in addition, a maximum of industrial sugars: children! Bingo!
Less acidification, less fevers and more devitalized sugars equal the great cancer boom!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
