Grelinette wrote:I do not know if my question is good but a Canadian (or Provençal) who sends fresh or hot air can settle pretty easily on any home: it is enough to have a mouth of arrival which propels the air from the basement directly into the home with a simple filtration.
No, because this type of solution involves several health risks: radon, molds
Not to mention the smell that there is usually in a basement.
It is not for nothing that the implementation of a Canadian well is as delicate, both in the choice of materials as realization.
And just because some people tinker with a piece of TPC sheath is not the solution and they take no risk for their health.
Grelinette wrote:Unless transferring the calories of the fluid to the air that will be propelled into the home, but in this case is there any loss of calorie transfer that makes this technique less efficient?
Yes it is this method that is normally used. And indeed the yield is less good than with a conventional Canadian well since there is a double exchange: first the land / water exchange and then the water / air exchange
This is a big drawback of this system, which makes it necessary to "oversize" the system compared to a Canadian well.
But to compare 2x40m of vitrified pipe in 200 and 400m of HDPE pipe in 32, I am not sure that the advantage is at first.
Frankly, try to concretely envisage the installation of a "classic" Canadian well at home, find out about the equipment, the difficulties of implementation (waterproofing, installation of the inspection manhole, condensate evacuation, entry into home) and I'm pretty sure 80% of you will look more seriously at Canadian water wells, even if you have to lose a bit of yield.
Grelinette wrote:Are there any comparative sketches of these Canadian 2 technical puzzles?
By searching the net and consulting the forums who talk about it, we manage to find feedback.
It may not always be very objective, but it still shows that a Canadian water well is "not that bad" than that.
Me anyway me choice is done.