Law Loppsi 2 against light habitat type Yurt?

[bernardd]

I just got the info that a couple was to be kicked out of their yurt this morning March 1st.

It was a listener who reported the eviction at minute 14:
http://sites.radiofrance.fr/play_aod.ph ... D=28022011

I have no information on the progress of this expulsion.

[bernardd]

Articles came out:
http://www.lepost.fr/article/2011/03/02 ... ourte.html
http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2011/03 ... ourte.html

The gendarmes have not yet come.

[bernardd]

What is surprising is that many yurts exist in France for rental:
http://www.yourte.com/index-page-breakfast.html

It therefore seems that what is prohibited is not to have yurts, but to live there.

An example of a yurt in Brittany, used as a dwelling:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9m0mt ... e-bio_news

As they say, less than 5000 € for a HQE home ...

[bernardd]

Another example in Alsace:

http://stras.info/Strasbourg/actualites ... bourg.html

http://mima-yourte-mimagilles.blogspot. ... te-de.html

[bamboo]

Knowing that even for garden sheds you need permits (large ones), it's not too surprising that they put constraints for yurts of 35m2 ...

[highfly-addict]

The applications of this law seem to have been rapid:

55. Considering, however, that the second and third paragraphs of the same paragraph allow the representative of the State to proceed with the forced evacuation of the premises when the formal notice to leave them within the period of forty-eight hours minimum fixed by the latter was not implemented and was not the subject of the suspensive action provided for in paragraph II; that these provisions make it possible to proceed urgently, at any time of the year, to the evacuation, without consideration of the personal or family situation, of disadvantaged people and who do not have decent accommodation; that the faculty given to these persons to seize the administrative court of a suspensive appeal cannot, in this case, constitute a sufficient guarantee to ensure a conciliation which would not be manifestly unbalanced between the need to safeguard public order and the constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms;

56. Considering that it follows that paragraphs I and II of article 90 of the referred law, which constitute an indivisible whole, must be declared contrary to the Constitution;

visible here

Cool !

[Christophe]

http://www.rue89.com/2011/09/07/loppsi- ... ons-220848

Loppsi: police will use their super spyware
By Estelle Dumout | Rue89 | 07/09/2011 | 10:33

"Keylogger": the bad word is dropped. Spyware is officially entering the arsenal that the police can use to carry out surveillance operations, in the context of investigations of suspected terrorists or people suspected of organized crime. The Loppsi 2 law on security, promulgated in March 2011, remained unclear on the exact means given to the police to monitor communications and digital data.

The circulars issued by the Ministry of Justice at the end of August are more precise: they explain to prosecutors and police how they must reconcile standard telephone and electronic interceptions with the new "computer capture measures" provided for in the text.

Getting around the search

For Benoît Tabaka, a lawyer specializing in Internet law and director of legal affairs at PriceMinister, the police will be able to search further than ever:

“These new devices no longer only target correspondence, but any form of computer document. "

These documents will be intercepted using a device physically grafted on the computer of the person being monitored, or via spy software of the keylogger type (keyloggers), installed remotely. These are the same type of cookies that some hackers use for malicious purposes to steal personal information from Internet users or to break into certain networks.

For the first time, the official circular clearly mentions these tools, and their purpose for the police:

“The knowledge of computer files stored in a computer or a device (and not mere words or images) without the knowledge of the user, even though these files would not be accessible by means of a sound system but only through a search. "

It could be any type of document, for example an article typed in a word processor, or instant conversations via an encrypted network. It does not matter whether the information is intended to pass through the networks or not. As Benoît Tabaka explains:

“This device makes it possible to bypass data encryption, since we can directly recover information typed on the keyboard or visible on the computer screen. It also hijacks the principle of the search by allowing access to erased data, or even never saved on the hard drive. "

The real issue: mobility

As with telephone interceptions, the installation of a computer recording must be ordered by an examining magistrate. The police must mention precisely the place of this capture, to identify the device concerned, and check that surveillance is carried out on French territory.

However, the issue is more about mobile phones, laptops or digital tablets than desktop computers, according to Benoît Tabaka.

"How to guarantee that a capture takes place in France, when the monitored person can connect from any location and therefore activate the device for recording information? If such surveillance were to take place, this would be tantamount to letting a French police officer enter the home of a suspect abroad without an international letter rogatory. "

Likewise, how can you be sure, with computers operating on a network or as part of a shared connection, that spyware is installed on the machine of the person actually targeted? And what to do with the substantial amount of documents collected through this, which will not all concern the investigation?

It will be up to the judges to be the guarantors of liberties and to say what is admissible or not, notes the lawyer, but beautiful puzzles await them.

As long as it remains a tool to fight terrorism, organized crime and serious crime ok ... but after? Imagine the formidable political weapon that it can be: intercepting the speech of a political opponent when he is writing it ...

We're getting closer to 1984, aren't we?

[bernardd]

This appears in official texts.

But it has been around much longer, of course. Not to mention the van on the street that sees all the screens around.