Vortex to save fuel?

Tips, advice and tips to lower your consumption, processes or inventions as unconventional engines: the Stirling engine, for example. Patents improving combustion: water injection plasma treatment, ionization of the fuel or oxidizer.
User avatar
nikolaj
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 173
Registration: 17/08/17, 18:38
Location: 35120 picking ring
x 14

Re: Vortex to save fuel?




by nikolaj » 17/11/17, 05:47

Gildas wrote:+1, Given this turbine on an Ibiza petrol, better acceleration noted by the owner. :)

Hello, this is a testimony by real observations of the usual user of the vehicle ...
so the incoming air seems to enter it faster and stronger?
and by that the fuel / air mixtures are more homogeneous? Yes ! better consumed by the air which is a gaseous complex, but beware of the altitude, where oxygen is rarer ... as in the mountains, thanks to the turbines, the engines therefore run better, because + air quickly admitted...
some "test / control benches" can therefore be put in test faults, if these criteria for installing the turbine (in an air hose) are not configured or calibrated ...
0 x
A mystery only perpetuates when there is refusal to study it (Georges Charpak?)
User avatar
nikolaj
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 173
Registration: 17/08/17, 18:38
Location: 35120 picking ring
x 14

Re: Vortex to save fuel?




by nikolaj » 22/03/19, 08:53

Janic wrote:
Janic wrote:
NB: I expect your case to 0.00% CO!

So impressive that I have trouble believing ... 0 to two decimal ???
Even LPG vehicles, as yet the gas mixture naturally in air, are far from that score ...
Now, you believe it, I have nothing to say. I expressed my doubt. Jesus walking on water, but I'm not!

Ah, those machines that tell anything! The head of CT did not believe that just ,. However if you look at the figures on the 25 you will realize that there are 3 decimal, which does not mean that there is a perfect zero, but the measure does not reach the hundredth. So on 25 where CO increased from 0,78 0,018 to be divided by approximately 4 between before and after shows, for over 25 years vehicle without particular setting (plug change, filter, oil) falling (and consumption) was still dizzy.
FOR MIRACLES, it will look elsewhere!

great debate, thank you all, so I am progressing ... thanks to you ...
Attachments
humour.PNG
humor.PNG (47.79 KIO) Accessed 3119 times
0 x
A mystery only perpetuates when there is refusal to study it (Georges Charpak?)
User avatar
nikolaj
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 173
Registration: 17/08/17, 18:38
Location: 35120 picking ring
x 14

Re: Vortex to save fuel?




by nikolaj » 09/10/23, 09:11

nikolaj wrote:
Janic wrote:
So impressive that I have trouble believing ... 0 to two decimal ???
Even LPG vehicles, as yet the gas mixture naturally in air, are far from that score ...
Now, you believe it, I have nothing to say. I expressed my doubt. Jesus walking on water, but I'm not!

Ah, those machines that tell anything! The head of CT did not believe that just ,. However if you look at the figures on the 25 you will realize that there are 3 decimal, which does not mean that there is a perfect zero, but the measure does not reach the hundredth. So on 25 where CO increased from 0,78 0,018 to be divided by approximately 4 between before and after shows, for over 25 years vehicle without particular setting (plug change, filter, oil) falling (and consumption) was still dizzy.
FOR MIRACLES, it will look elsewhere!

great debate, thank you all, so I am progressing ... thanks to you ...

here is one of the wonders among the economical, ecological, aerodynamic air star cyclones:
0 x
A mystery only perpetuates when there is refusal to study it (Georges Charpak?)

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 200 guests