"RHP system" fuel saver, it works !!

Tips, advice and tips to lower your consumption, processes or inventions as unconventional engines: the Stirling engine, for example. Patents improving combustion: water injection plasma treatment, ionization of the fuel or oxidizer.
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars




by martien007 » 17/06/08, 16:51

georges100 wrote:during the 1st it would surprise me :D at the time we believed above all in the virtues of castor oil :D
during the second I mostly heard about injecting anything into the cylinders provided it pulls ...
what's funny is that in their ad they talk about the work of messerschmit who never made an engine :D

You drew too quickly: typing error, I corrected while you were sending your answer. : Lol:
0 x
georges100
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 338
Registration: 25/05/08, 16:51
x 1




by georges100 » 17/06/08, 17:01

only devices from the second I saw a few steal and I never saw them smoke to the point of being spotted : Mrgreen:
and for the consumption we put additional tanks .... : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
crispus
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 401
Registration: 08/09/06, 20:51
Location: Rennes
x 1




by crispus » 17/06/08, 18:26

If the "economizers" with magnets are based as one can think of it on the MHD, they work all the better as the fuel circulates quickly in the magnetic field.
I noticed that the tuning madmen say a lot about magnets, those who are already driving in economy mode do not consume enough for it to be effective : Lol:

On injection models, the flow is higher since the pump delivers a larger volume continuously, the excess going into the overflow. For carburetor models, unless I crush the pedal I don't really believe it.

Current hoses are conductive inside (carbon deposition), precisely to avoid the electrification of the fluid likely to cause fires. That could explain why the magnets give better results on an old vehicle, even with fuel ...
0 x
Corpse Grinder 666
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 148
Registration: 17/11/08, 11:54




by Corpse Grinder 666 » 28/12/08, 04:49

and how much the economizer ???
0 x
fthanron
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 292
Registration: 13/10/07, 17:56
Location: Loir et Cher




by fthanron » 19/04/09, 11:19

Up!

Hi Christophe, what is the news from your test?
0 x
Frederic
rodibruno
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 157
Registration: 06/11/06, 22:19
Location: ARGENTINA
x 6

I use this magnet technology




by rodibruno » 19/04/09, 17:39

fthanron wrote:Up!

Hi Christophe, what is the news from your test?


I use this magnet technology.
Install the magnet on my Nissan aspirating 3.200cc diesel engine and reducing consumption by 15% to 20%, but some imams who do not work. These magnets are used by my neodymium and very powerful, you put two magnets in the pipelines.
Installation of a set of magnets in each injection tube, close to the injection, also installed a set of magnets at the inlet of the fuel injection pump.
Works very well.

Image
0 x
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7




by elephant » 19/04/09, 18:08

It seems to me that we are messing around a bit: in March 2007, a certain Chevelle 69 (which has never made a publication) initiates this post and some others follow suit.

We think we are dreaming: we have always had testimonies on these forums who say that the magnet systems do not work, except by the placebo effect! And here, we bring out this old subject! : Evil:

Once and for all: until you can prove by "double blind" test let these things work, refrain (I almost used another, coarser term)

So, the procedure when you really believe in an economizer:
- get one or two.
- summon two or three "forumeurs econologists "well known with their vehicles. (whose consumption they know well)
- unbeknownst to the drivers, but with an observer, put it on or not put it in place (or put it into service). The observer cannot have contact with the driver.
- drive 3 or 4 times 100 km timed on the motorway by connecting or disconnecting the device at the refueling / measurement stops, so that the driver does not know anything.

and then, we will see (don't forget that I consider the last tests of Jean Marc Moreau noted by the bailiff as bogus, the car being able to perfectly have been "prepared" for the test, the bailiff - in this case a bailiff - not qualified to verify the conformity of the vehicle)

In the meantime, I would always express strong reservations about the effectiveness of these booby traps sold by scammers (pcq, even if it works it is sold 3 or 4 X too expensive!)
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
rodibruno
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 157
Registration: 06/11/06, 22:19
Location: ARGENTINA
x 6




by rodibruno » 20/04/09, 04:37

elephant wrote:It seems to me that we are messing around a bit: in March 2007, a certain Chevelle 69 (which has never made a publication) initiates this post and some others follow suit.

We think we are dreaming: we have always had testimonies on these forums who say that the magnet systems do not work, except by the placebo effect! And here, we bring out this old subject! : Evil:

Once and for all: until you can prove by "double blind" test let these things work, refrain (I almost used another, coarser term)

So, the procedure when you really believe in an economizer:
- get one or two.
- summon two or three "forumeurs econologists "well known with their vehicles. (whose consumption they know well)
- unbeknownst to the drivers, but with an observer, put it on or not put it in place (or put it into service). The observer cannot have contact with the driver.
- drive 3 or 4 times 100 km timed on the motorway by connecting or disconnecting the device at the refueling / measurement stops, so that the driver does not know anything.

and then, we will see (don't forget that I consider the last tests of Jean Marc Moreau noted by the bailiff as bogus, the car being able to perfectly have been "prepared" for the test, the bailiff - in this case a bailiff - not qualified to verify the conformity of the vehicle)

In the meantime, I would always express strong reservations about the effectiveness of these booby traps sold by scammers (pcq, even if it works it is sold 3 or 4 X too expensive!)



Elephant:

Be aware that the results are not instant.
The system requires the consumption of four or five tanks of fuel before it can perform an effective measurement. Na same thing happens if you remove the magnets after four or five tanks returned to their normal consumption. It is curious, since all the materials involved in the injection or carburation circuit, where the travel fuel, are not ferromagnetic.
But it works and I did not sell them.

Thank you
0 x
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7




by elephant » 20/04/09, 21:47

Sorry, Rodibruno! Evidence, we want evidence: the future of humanity (or almost) is at this price! The credibility of the site too! ( mostly)

Either you have made a scientific and reproducible discovery or you are bluffing: your choice! In any event: the car - the usual consumption of which will have been noted well in advance and in the same season - must be driven by a driver who is unaware of the presence of the device.

And there is no point in making us compare January consumption measurements with those of July: on my Opel it makes almost a half liter difference! (diesel) 6 liters in winter, 5,5 in summer.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79288
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11024




by Christophe » 20/04/09, 21:54

fthanron wrote:Up!

Hi Christophe, what is the news from your test?


None I haven't ridden it long enough, besides I drive more ... I must also return it to Guidi ...

For diesel owners, use M7 instead (like "Maloche 7%"): https://www.econologie.com/forums/voiture-di ... t5849.html
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 123 guests