The thermokinetics compressor Joseph Haiun

[Christophe]

good video is better than the crap

http://www.auer-gianola.fr/pages/video.php

This topic pulsed boiler is very interesting and deserves, I think, not a new Topic?

[crispus]

Hey, it's curious: why are not you-it boundary layer turbulent flow? It therefore means that the fluid in contact with the tube no longer slows down when he spins? Think for yourself before believing Michel Bridge word ...

I have no competence regarding the principle of combustion, I only know that a pulse operation generally has a better performance than a continuous operation (combustion engine vs steam engine).

However, I can say that

this exchanger operating at a mutual Pantone reactor :

Heat communicates kinetic energy to all molecules, and if the vortex is sufficiently ionized (heat is a good way)

most of this kinetic energy is transferred outside of the vortex because the angular velocity is constant and therefore the upper tangential speed at the periphery:

Vmaximum => [mV² / 2] maximum

This energy is converted into heat by ions friction against the tube walls. Lorentz force adds to the centrifugal force to increase the quality of friction. Then the metal of the tube in turn communicates the heat to the heating fluid.

The molecules located at the heart of the vortex, yet thermally "insulated" from the walls, gradually transmit their energy to those of the periphery. by electromagnetic couplingWhile in principle they should stay hot and keep their speed. Hence a general and simultaneous lowering of the velocity of the gases and their temperature, all at low pressure.

Hence the "miracle" of cooling gases to 25 ° C in less than a meter.

In short, it is the basic MHD: the controlled entropy ...

Concerning the famous Lorentz forces, key of the vortex, they are certainly infinitely small, but superior in first approximation to the forces of Van der Wals, supposed nevertheless to have given its spherical form to our planet ... Respect.

[Christophe]

I have no competence regarding the principle of combustion, I only know that a pulse operation generally has a better performance than a continuous operation (combustion engine vs steam engine).

False ... and in the absolute it is rather the opposite ... we must compare what is comparable: the performance of a heat engine in acceleration (variable) and continuously for example.

Compare a steam engine with a combustion engine to illustrate this example is completely Aberant ... The difference in yield between a steam engine and a combustion engine does not come from any of this fact but the technology is completely different ( internal / external combustion engine) and in the case of steam is just uses an intermediate working fluid ...

It is this kind of reasoning can lead to outlandish theories ... So beware!

[crispus]

Thank you for writing that it is wrong that I have no skill

For the rest I await reactions on "my" part ...

[Christophe]

Thank you for writing that it is wrong that I have no skill

I did not say that ... just that some scientists were dangerous shortcuts.

As for "your" part, what more can we say than what has already been said? I am not a physicist and my engineering training was quite limited in electromagnetism ... but I fear that shortcuts like the one we have just seen do not go into the credibility of "your theory" ... even if it there are good points ...

Anyway this is not the subject of EC TOPIC ...

[bob_isat]

Hey, it's curious: why are not you-it boundary layer turbulent flow? It therefore means that the fluid in contact with the tube no longer slows down when he spins? Think for yourself before believing Michel Bridge word ...

there is a boundary layer turbulent flow:

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9sis ... frottement

"In the flow of a fluid on a plane we see in the immediate vicinity of the plane a slowing down of the fluid. The thickness where the fluid is slowed down is called the boundary layer and varies from a few tenths of a mm in laminar flow to more or less 10 mm in turbulent flow. In the boundary layer the air molecules are slowed down, which results in a loss of energy which must be compensated by the energy supplied by the propulsion of the aircraft. "

for MHD and entropy mastered, I think we should ask the Ummites ...

http://perso.orange.fr/ummo.textes-essentiels/f002.htm

[Christophe]

for MHD and entropy mastered, I think we should ask the Ummites ...

+19870979698689698

[Other]

Hello

I only know that impulse operation generally has better performance than continuous operation (combustion engine vs steam engine).

I know what it means except that the comparison is chosen poorly defined

It would have been necessary to compare a piston engine with a turbine
or one with a rotary engine a steam turbine where the flow is (constant)
But for the piston engine which seems a inconvéneant, the fact that the top stop piston goes down and it gives an advantage to have a small linear piston speed which gives time for ignition. millisecond for allummer has 6000 rpm!

Those who play on the timings ahead 30degres know at top dead center it gives a short stroke of the piston 30 degrees in the middle of the race it gives a large movement of the plunger!


Andre

[Christophe]

I know what it means except that the comparison is chosen poorly defined

It would have been necessary to compare a piston engine with a turbine
or one with a rotary engine a steam turbine where the flow is (constant)

Well precisely your comparison is judicious (more than my explanation) and precisely the efficiency of turbines are superior to reciprocating piston engines ... It is therefore in "continuous" that the yields are better ...

In the same kind of reasoning, slow diesel engines have better yields than fast diesel ... because their operation is precisely more "continuous" ...

[freddau]

Are there a way to get the item in Adobe format.

I would spend our energy service.

In this case you can ask your "energy department" to buy the S&V in question, right? That's the lesser of it...

Sorry to cut the dial on Aspectes technq.
But yes we can buy the S&V, I had not seen that it came from there.