bebeours wrote:In launching this post, I wanted to know why we did not attend more the engine in his breathing.
When you blow into the carburetor inlet, there is the risk of completely disrupting the carburation. For it to work "better", if it is not originally planned, it is also necessary to "pressurize" the rest of the different vents that you find a little on all sides of the carburetor. They are not all connected to the air filter and when the pressures inside / outside are reversed, the air or fuel flow too ...
And then for it really works better you have to blow a lot of air, which absorbs a lot of power on the crankshaft, and the blower of the deuch it is certainly a little light with some unfortunate little millibars.
Leave it to blow as much with a turbo that works with the lost energy of the exhaust.
The vortex WITH and the pantone go in this direction it seems to me.
I also know that it is not advisable to put a compressor to the air intake of the engine, but a better oxygenated engine must certainly consume less.
The AVEC creates a turbulence favorable to the combustion (more complete) but goes rather in the direction of braking the gases of admission.
The Pantome "prepares" the intake air for it so that the engine can swallow a mixture of water and water vapor under conditions which reduce pollution and consumption (more complete combustion, less hot (and more prolonged). This preparation of the air and the partial obstruction of the pot by the reactor also go in the direction of reducing the total air flow.
The consumption does not directly follow the parameter "oxygenation" but the total yield is more complicated ...
Message for citro: Every time I read one of your texts, with the portrait of Emmet Brawn next door, I feel like I hear Doc read the text. I do not know if I'm the only one.
no !