Christine wrote:I haven't had this problem since we moved to the flat country ...
https://www.econologie.com/forums/de-belles- ... t4142.html
Christine wrote:I haven't had this problem since we moved to the flat country ...
Did67 wrote:So in a discussion on fuel savings in France, this is as incongruous as imagining the pope promoting the morning after pill in a slum in Sao Paulo!
Did67 wrote:When the road descends sufficiently, it is therefore much better to lift your foot but stay engaged and consume "0 l / 100 km" because the ECU cuts off the injection - rather than disengaging and consuming the figures indicated.
Of course, if it goes down less, you will have to consume a little so as not to slow down (by declutching or accelerating very very slightly - a priori, my calculator does not give me a significant difference but this is not easy to measure).
christophe wrote:
Did67 wrote:Of course, if it goes down less, you will have to consume a little so as not to slow down (by declutching or accelerating very very slightly - a priori, my calculator does not give me a significant difference but this is not easy to measure).
Philippe Schutt wrote:
do you think the injection computer is capable of delivering less than at idle? possible on new models ... In this case, if the engine brake is weak the grip can be more interesting, actually.
Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 302 guests