Central implosive electrolysis

[dedeleco]

Instead of dreaming, in the blur, measure accurately the changes in energy, heat, volume, optics, etc., of everything you say at random, work done well before you, by many, since Lavoisier in 1780, and which is one of the bases of physical chemistry.
I gave some basic explanations that you seem to ignore, given the vagueness of your statements.

In a nutshell, you return to the starting volume of electrolyzed liquid water, to make your gas falsely implosive !!

[gildas]

In a nutshell, you return to the starting volume of electrolyzed liquid water, to make your gas falsely implosive !!

Yes, but this volume comes back in an engine running at atmospheric pressure, the water could also be returned to the electrolyser as electricity.

[dedeleco]

Measure and make the energy balance and you will see that it is necessary to supply electrical energy from an outside source.

[Gaston]

Yes, thanks to the mechanical movement of the implosion motor.

Well, it remains to be verified.

Yes, it seems to me

[dedeleco]

It is a vacuum engine, low power even less than compressed air!

[gildas]

A trick that could capture the electric arc during the implosion would be to place a spring (between the cylinder head and the piston) which acts as a lightning rod with one end placed just in the center of the cylinder volume and the other (isolated engine block) to a storage system for return to the electrolyser.

[dedeleco]

A trick that could capture the electric arc during the implosion would be to place a spring (between the cylinder head and the piston) which acts as a lightning rod with one end placed just in the center of the cylinder volume and the other (isolated engine block) to a storage system for return to the electrolyser.

Fun, but the arc occurs during the recombination explosion of H2 with O2 very energetic, which heats the gases enormously, which gives very strong ultraviolet sending this energy towards the walls, (like the sun), which ionizes the plasma gas that gives a little electricity, so well designed, but almost nothing compared to heat energy and heat radiation associated.

Look on google rocket reactors of Saturn, NASA, and Ariane, who make this reaction to very great power.

The implosion is slow, thermal condensation of cooling water produced, very slow, compared to the explosion, and low energy, as when you crush a bottle under your feet.

[gildas]

Please watch this video where the author with a little foam containing HHO (thus protected from the air), deposits it in a cylinder to make an implosion.

The piston does not eject a millimeter, but goes in the other direction, irrefutable proof of an implosion.Il is absolutely no explosion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi1foaqn8Eo

[dedeleco]

Good night,
Answer given in the comments 5 years ago, identical to mine, to read carefully:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi1foaqn8Eo

no insulation> heat escapes immediately through thin walls via radiation, rather than remaining there for the gas to use it for expansion. assume remaining vibration energy of h2o has a 30% absolute increase (100K) prior to some of it collapses to liquid.

I see that there is water droplets on the walls. When the H2 + O burns in a closed system it turns into H20 right, thus taking up less room. So it 'appears' to implode

if its really 2H2 + O2 (both gas) the result (H2O gas (steam)) should take exactly 1/2 the space the reactants had plus minus any expansion due to excess heat. lets say the volume was 10% of reactant gases> outcome should equal 95% of the original volume not counting expansion of gas due to excess heat.

[gildas]

Fun, but the arc occurs during the recombination explosion of H2 with O2 very energetic, which heats the gases enormously, which gives very strong ultraviolet sending this energy towards the walls, (like the sun), which ionizes the gas in plasma which therefore gives a little electricity, so well designed, but almost nothing compared to the energy heat and heat radiation associated.

So a priori, this colossal energy of HHO could burn a water mist in an explosion engine ...

Production of a generator
functioning without fossil fuels

On the main lines :
In order to reach our goal, very close to Stan Meyer, we need to power the engine of three things:
Air - it is normally powered in the existing air filter.
Hydroxy gas - how to do this has already been explained in great detail.
A fog of very fine water droplets, sometimes called "cold water mist".

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapt10F.html (towards the middle)


_______________________________________________

By generating a wave of plasma electric, you can turn on the water at rates of 4500 meters per second. It creates an extremely strong shock wave in the air. Another aspect of this theory is that you can by mist of water in your bottles, or a cold water vapor. Then generate a plasma spark ignition with a standard candle or storm plug of some kind. This video is proof that an ignition of the plasma in the water will cause a shock wave and, in turn, the ability to blow up the water inside your bottle.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9NvboKL43Q