The zetetic circle warming denier?

[Christophe]

Woodcutter breaks you not ... it will keep going the ...

Otherwise for the tone 2) I would not be as affirmative as you, what is certain is that the Earth has the most developed greenhouse effect and T ° the most stable (thank you water ...) ...

[thejoker]

so

N2 is not a greenhouse gas, O2 is not a GHG, Argon is not a GHG and there we are already at 99,997% of the "dry" atmosphere.

yaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?

and what% half max produti by man?

and what part is propelled into the atmosphere?

while

The sun: Activity more intense since 1940 than during the 1150 years that preceded.

Mercury: Discovery of a surprising polar ice accompanied by an intense and unexpected intrinsic magnetic field for what was supposed to be a "dead" planet.

Venus: (!) Increase 25 a factor in the light of dawn and the biggest change in the overall atmosphere within 30 years.

Mars Global Warming, huge storms, disappearance of polar ice.

Jupiter: Doubling the brightness of surrounding plasma clouds. Appearance of large red and equator spots in warming of 10 ° F.

Saturn: Sudden decrease of the equatorial wind speeds, in only 20 years, accompanied by an astonishing increase of the X-ray emission of the equator.

Uranus: Very large variations in brightness accompanied by increased cloud activity.

Neptune: Increase of 40% of the atmospheric brightness.

Pluto: intense warming with a tripling of atmospheric pressure ... while Pluto is moving away from the sun ...

All these observations are from established sources including NASA. They reveal not only the Earth, but the entire solar system entirely, returned in a phase of change and particularly intense warming. When we see the huge variations that exist on our companions in the solar system, we say with our small 0,6 + ° C / 100 years, we still have very lucky!

http://www.pensee-unique.fr/theses.html

[Christophe]

yaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?

Nope has steam ...

[thejoker]

yaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?

Nope has steam ...

so c the water vapor that is responsible for warming
or water vapor is the clouds, right?

[Christophe]

Yes partly responsible ... we already told you above it seems to me arrested to your dork...

What I like about zetetics is how they are unable to change their point of view and to question their "beliefs"...

[thejoker]

the creation of clouds is the thesis of Svensmark and therefore according to solar activity

no co² in there ....

which of you is interested in Svensmark ??

[Christophe]

A solar activity does not prevent a greenhouse effect of human origin due to CO2 and Methane ... more greenhouse effect = more water vapor = more greenhouse effect ... so it goes in the sense of a runaway of warming ... and I'm not even talking about methane hydrates ...

I repeat what you do not seem to want to compile in your head:

What I like about the Zetetics is the way they are unable to change their point of view and question their "beliefs" ...

[thejoker]

emaballement of a warming while we know that lower temperatures average age?
we are going towards a glacial period

and finally how water vapor and clouds have to do with the co²?

read svensmark and stop believing that I'm in a zetetic chapel or whatever ....

for now you don 'have not demonstrated reading Svensmark then your comments on questioning make me laugh

[Christophe]

read svensmark and stop believing that I'm in a zetetic chapel or whatever ....

for now you don 'have not demonstrated reading Svensmark then your comments on questioning make me laugh

http://www.pensee-unique.fr/theses.html what do you mean? Yes and so? The warming is not of fossil origin that removes one of the 2 big problem related to the use of these energies.

There is even a point when you neglect the problem: it is the depletion of fossil resources. You say yourself (cf https://www.econologie.com/forums/post54143.html#54143 ) We should not burn the oil (I agree ...) ...

If warming is, admittedly, not from fossil fuels, it will stop at nothing exhaustion and therefore the need to be now (not tomorrow) saving ... You humanist nuclear pro you this should compendre.

[thejoker]

not econome
but spend a has a superior density of energy

because the economy is on the backs of people who meurrent mass every day since 30 years ......