Telework harmful to the greenhouse effect?

Warming and Climate Change: causes, consequences, analysis ... Debate on CO2 and other greenhouse gas.
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7




by elephant » 29/05/07, 14:05

Christophe? What are you worried about? We talk.

I wanted to invite everyone to reflect on their personal case, especially since it is not at all sure that if a company N offers teleworking to N 'people, it will save on the proportional amount of energy: when you see empty offices lit "a giorno" in the evening around 19 pm in large cities, questions arise.

Now, what proportion of workstations are really convertible to teleworking? And if they are, are we not going to relocate them? (We have relocated Jupiler's accounts in the Czech Republic and there are now Dutch-speaking call centers in Bulgaria)
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79318
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11040




by Christophe » 29/05/07, 14:15

I do not bring ... I explain :D

Yes it is a safe bet that when companies can really relocate teleworking (a major part of the profession of executive would be easily feasible in telecommuting not?) They will do much more ... see the Indian programmers ... but also we deviate ...
0 x
Targol
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1897
Registration: 04/05/06, 16:49
Location: Bordeaux region
x 2




by Targol » 29/05/07, 14:37

There are some differences between teleworking and offshoring:
  • In general, teleworking is only part-time. The employee comes to work for meetings (or others) one day a week and, as such, shares a common office with other employees who do not come the same day as him. It is more difficult to bring an Indian one day a week.
  • What is relocatable is what does not require particular knowledge (or know-how). Companies are not stupid either. They will not risk getting their techs hooked on by foreign subcontractors by giving them to do their most strategic processes. This is where employees must be most vigilant: when know-how is externalized, it is the first step towards relocation ...

Otherwise, another comment about this study is that it does not consider homemakers at all. Only couples exist whose 2 work (so we reduce the heating during the day). If one of the 2 (and any children) are at home during the day, it's full pipo !!!
0 x
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can continue indefinitely in a finite world is a fool, or an economist." KEBoulding
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79318
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11040




by Christophe » 29/05/07, 15:02

Targol wrote:It's full pipo !!!


Good remark :)
0 x
User avatar
elephant
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6646
Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
x 7




by elephant » 29/05/07, 17:45

Targol said:

What is relocatable is what does not require particular knowledge (or know-how). Companies are not stupid either


objection your honor: you would be surprised: computer firms outsource their developments, the art is to split the work. (and it can even be done in a hut made of corrugated iron sheets)
Even in biotechnology: lab technicians can do tests that last days and days and require lots of manipulation, without knowing what they do

finally, we leave the subject, sorry
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79318
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11040




by Christophe » 06/01/09, 22:11

A nice counter example in practice and in France, at Hama! Teleworking is good for the environment, no offense to the english city: http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=CyeM7Kcyw_M
0 x
Targol
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1897
Registration: 04/05/06, 16:49
Location: Bordeaux region
x 2




by Targol » 06/01/09, 22:47

I am seriously wondering if I will not send this link to my HRD ....
0 x
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can continue indefinitely in a finite world is a fool, or an economist." KEBoulding
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79318
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11040




by Christophe » 06/01/09, 22:49

It must be necessary :) go go go!

Do not send the link forum with the study con con English but just that of the video!
0 x
Targol
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1897
Registration: 04/05/06, 16:49
Location: Bordeaux region
x 2




by Targol » 06/01/09, 23:01

Christophe wrote:It must be necessary :) go go go!

Do not send the link forum with the study con con English but just that of the video!


In this period of partial unemployment, I hesitate a little anyway.
I'll let the night over and see ...
... maybe going through the unions, it would be less hot?
0 x
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can continue indefinitely in a finite world is a fool, or an economist." KEBoulding
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79318
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11040




by Christophe » 06/01/09, 23:04

Well, I do not know your box ...

I don't see what the unions are doing in this "demand" ...

Just pass him in private "for info" ... now I don't know the size of your box ...
0 x

Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 158 guests