This is an interpretation ... Christian, because in Judaism the messiah come for the Jewish people (reunification of Israel and realization of the 4 miracles prophesied), and his last must then lead the world to a better tomorrow
It is, again, linked to ONE culture, not to the reference text that is the biblical writings (in other cultures it would be other founding texts taken in reference). Here again this confusion between FOR and PAR.
(so by the Jewish people as you mention).
Of course, but respecting the meaning of the text that they are commissioned to show
by Example what these laws can bring concrete in the everyday life of the population, whatever it is. Hence this formula "
when the nations see all the blessings that are yours, they will ask what is your god so that we follow him. Clearly, I have already mentioned, the Jewish people is a prototype intended to be mass produced and not to be and remain a unique copy.
So it's like saying politics is made FOR politicians (and it happens a few times, but again it's hijacking) and not
BY The politicians
FOR the people. In the latter case they are in their function. The goal set for the "Jews" is to be the "guardians of the temple," that is to say, the law as any legislature to this function. After they are concerned with the application of these laws to themselves, it is obvious just as police, police and judges are not exempt from being subject to them too. (Even if some rotten apples think they are exempt!)
It is a relatively different vision from that of Christians where the return of Christ will come among the "righteous" which does not imply any particular religious or ethnic affiliation.
There too, we must not confuse the Catholic-Protestant interpretations of the texts (those that we call "usurped" by Christians) and the texts themselves. This kind of interpretation is an attempt at recovery to their churches where "
out of the church no point of salvation ».
The Messiah Jesus does not speak in terms of the righteous, but of practitioners of justice according to their heart, in the respect of the mosaic law (Jesus was "Jewish", rabbi and therefore doctor of the law) There is no one without the other. But "Christianity" has turned away from the law (like their predecessors), laws instituted for their happiness, always according to the text in reference.
Jews, Christians, Buddhists, atheists or any other label, it is blah blah intended to make everyone believe that he is on the right side of the truth, which does not belong to anyone. On the other hand, as all inspired texts say:
it is to their works that you will recognize them !
Quote:
it is always a distorted and therefore inaccurate vision of the set objective.
Culture is based on the exchange of information, it is totally futile to believe that a concept will not be improperly recovered.
Totally agree, but it's still and always recovery,
so deformation. Would you take a plane that you would know that the conditions of manufacture and maintenance are not respected and you would take this type of device in reference on the pretext that it is the only type of gear in circulation?
Religions (of which atheism is a part too) it's the same thing, since the time they are in circulation they become the reference and few people ask themselves whether these religions are in good condition. operation. But for me in any case, I do not seek to recognize any religion as a reference, but to know what are the best conditions for the manufacture and maintenance of these devices, it is fundamentally different. And when I put a continuation of ???? this concerns the initial manual, not the rest.
Quote:
So where would the common thread lead to mass extermination?
The common thread is the historical facts: reminder: the Nazism leading to the Second World War and more than 60 million dead ...
Communism at nearly 100 million dead ...
As for the totalitarian merchant system, certain demographers speak "calmly" of a drop in the world population from 9 billion to 2/3 billion by a series of collapses that I dare not imagine!
Hence the question: where is the relationship with THE messianism, the true, not with its diversion?
You are a thread that is unfamiliar to me. Clearly you quote the bad apples from the basket, I see those that are good for the consumption and health of its consumers. The junction is difficult or impossible between the two.
Quote:
Abuses that are everywhere. No need to invoke any messianism.
If the abuses are everywhere in the human history, the fact is that the belief in a final objective has for nature to multiply the determination among its practitioners ...
Any belief in an end goal. Ecology has its own as any other sector of human life (and we return to degrowth!) This determination can generate fanaticism as peace processes. It depends on the way we look at things. The media speak of Islamist fanatics and few or no others who are nevertheless the majority.
It also has the consequence of creating self-fulfilling prophecies and that is why messianism presents a major danger.
We can not avoid deviations in any field, the question is: are these deviations dominant, the norm, or are they at the margin. Some religions have negatively and indelibly marked the story, but no one seems to have asked the question: "
Did True Believers Adhere to Their Speeches and Terrorist Acts? "? I doubt !
Quote:
When Coluche founds these restaurants, he saw this as a stall and therefore intended to be taken over by the competent authorities.
The reality is a little less "altruistic" ...
It's okay that the reality is far from the ideal proposed and that it would be so much better if the humans were "angels", but we live in humans among humans and what I retain are precisely the altruists who participate, regardless of whether the "bad guys" are on the wrong side, these restaurants serve to show that all humans are not bad apples and that there is still good in the man. Is not this the most important thing?