sen-no-sen wrote:Indeed the speed of collapse of a society is proportional to its ability to dissipate energy ...
You talk to the future there?
Historically I do not see! even if the Southerners had been more numerous!
perplex wrote:sen-no-sen wrote:Indeed the speed of collapse of a society is proportional to its ability to dissipate energy ...
Historically I do not see!
sen-no-sen wrote:Even with growth of 0,2% per year, a simple "moderation" effort would not allow it to return to an acceptable level.
sen-no-sen wrote:In industrialized countries it will be necessary to consider a decrease of 50% to 70% spread on 15 or 20 years maximum
Aumicron wrote:A real effort of moderation would reverse the trend and it would already be a big step. [/ B]
How much do you put on this eventuality?
It reminds me of people who have to lose weight and who lose 5 kg in 2 weeks and who take back 8 then. Same for tobacco and alcohol.
In theory: yes! But the patient, in general, is torn between the fear of a catastrophe and the loss of pleasure or comfort (despite its drawbacks) and unfortunately we usually choose the second solution .. even final!I do not think we are talking about the same thing here, if I take the example of doping (because our society is doped) a doctor noting the state of his patient would not say that we must be moderate but stop as soon as possible on pain of death, and for this you need a shock treatment and act quickly.
Janic wrote: In theory: yes! But the patient, in general, is torn between the fear of a catastrophe and the loss of pleasure or comfort (despite its drawbacks) (...)
totally illusory! to live with less with us is like living with a lot for other parts of humanity.It is possible to live better with much less and have the advantage of abandoning the race forwards thermodynamic, such as the drastic reduction of pollution.
Janic wrote: totally illusory! to live with less with us is like living with a lot for other parts of humanity.
In the same way our dieting will not prevent others from eating what we will not consume anymore.
This is Marxist messianism of its kind!This is not utopian and can be extrapolated to the rest of the world by adapting the concept to the way of life of developing countries.
Matthew 6-24: " you can not serve god and mammon at the same time »But for this it is necessary to put an end to the messianism of growth and the cult of deregulated markets.
Nothing contradicts the fact that if another model had been put in place, things would have been radically different and would have allowed for country-specific initiatives based on its traditions and the level of development achieved.
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 236 guests