New IPCC report: we left for 1000 years!

Warming and Climate Change: causes, consequences, analysis ... Debate on CO2 and other greenhouse gas.
yoananda
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 60
Registration: 30/10/09, 15:32




by yoananda » 14/12/09, 12:54

This is the reality of those who claim to fight against global warming.
That's not a problem for you? me if!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenh ... edges.html

The haggling of the air has begun! This is to save the planet?
That's not a problem for you? me if!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenh ... t-5bn.html

Warming connected to the sun!
That's not a problem for you? me if!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenh ... ation.html

I am 100% agree to stop the pollution. But it has nothing to do with this tax breathing ... it has everything to do with predatory capitalism, with an ideology of maximum profit, with the trade of misery in all its forms (illness, ignorance, malaise)
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79287
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11024




by Christophe » 11/07/10, 14:29

09.07.2010 11:07
Climatgate: British researchers laundered handling charges

The English University of East Anglia had launched an investigation following the scandal triggered by the publication of emails from scientists from its research department on climate change. She concludes that there is no trace of manipulation.

According to the findings of the third survey commissioned by the University of East Anglia, there is no Climatgate.

The report, written by former Glasgow University Dean Sir Muir Russell, says he found no trace of manipulation in e-mails exchanged by scientists from the climate change research department. "Their thoroughness and honesty as scientists are not in doubt," he says.


Suite: http://hightech.nouvelobs.com/actualite ... ation.html
0 x
Ptilu
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 196
Registration: 15/01/10, 14:23




by Ptilu » 11/07/10, 15:06

Obviously ...
But, Copenhagen has been a fiasco, rotten winter, and the media will never make the noise necessary to restore the image of the IPCC ... In your opinion, we lost how much time? (Some say that the refusal to ratify the Kyoto protocol by the US Congress has lost 10 years ...).

I do not say that the climagate is the only one responsible, but admit that he put a big doubt
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 11/07/10, 17:39

Indeed, in the minds of many people "global warming" is a thing of the past ... even if slightly inaccurate information is then dismissed.
In addition, the many books on the thesis anti-warming does not improve the situation.
In fact to believe some of his theses, there is no warming, and, icing on the cake, oil would not fail, the fact that it would be abiotic ... :frown:
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Ptilu
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 196
Registration: 15/01/10, 14:23




by Ptilu » 11/07/10, 19:10

abiotic? quesaco?

The top of the p-op:

global warming has been created from scratch by capital to recover carbon taxes, blame the populace, and destroy freedom ...

Yes, I saw this on cons conspiracy site. Obviously the climategate enchanted;)
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 11/07/10, 19:19

Ptilu wrote:

abiotic? quesaco?


An alternative theory that spreads on the web, claiming that oil is not of organic (fossil) but mineral origin, and that moreover could be renewed, because present in the bowels of the earth in colossal quan ...
Some say that the "majors" would have invented the thesis of organic oil to justify a peak and therefore increasingly high prices!

I do not know if you have to laugh or cry about it ...
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Ptilu
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 196
Registration: 15/01/10, 14:23




by Ptilu » 11/07/10, 19:47

I would like to see the scientific documents that support this thesis ... Because I want to laugh :)

The conspiracy theorists shoot themselves in the foot there because in this case Lavoisier and all the scientists who followed him would be in the know

Demonstrated by the absurd ...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79287
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11024




by Christophe » 13/07/10, 16:35

Speaking of climate controversy: http://www.terra-economica.info/L-objec ... 11384.html

The goal of the Allègre Foundation is massive misinformation

"Claude Allègre launches a foundation that says he wants to promote another ecology and seeks funding from major industrial groups.

First, why? Certainly not to promote a scientific debate for which he has definitely disqualified himself, as demonstrated by the book titled The Impostor, it is he and the petition of 400 scientists establishing the lies and willful errors of his best seller.

This foundation aims to organize misinformation more massively. It will introduce in France what Exxon has done so well in the United States by funding think tanks designed to create doubt about climate change and not to increase knowledge. The use of the word ecology in the name of this foundation coming from such an adversary of ecology on the verge of delirium, illustrates this stated desire to throw disorder. This is for me a greenwashing of the most conservative ideas, intended to allow the maintenance of the oil company and the economic interests that go with it for as long as possible.

However, when we measure the growing weight of lobbies in contemporary society, we can only be worried to see thus institutionalize in France a foundation whose unacknowledged goal will be to destroy all the efforts undertaken by the world of consumption. and the environment, which have so many difficulties to come to fruition.

Therefore, the essential thing is to demand transparency first of all by refusing to call this foundation if it is born otherwise than the Allegre Foundation, whatever the fancy names it gives itself.

Then, by demanding advertising on the donors of the foundation. It is necessary that the sponsors of Claude Allègre make themselves known so that the citizens consumers can be informed and decide by their acts of consumption if they wish or not to finance the Allègre Foundation. The taxpayer will necessarily do it already thanks to the game of tax deductions; the consumer can choose. Thus, the companies sponsors of the foundation will they take the responsibility to finance, vis-à-vis their customers, their shareholders and justify in their report of sustainable development for example. Will they do it?

The future will tell, but it is clear that the mobilization of the associative world, in particular the one who works in good intelligence with the companies, is essential so that this foundation is born in the transparency and not in the camouflage, that it is act of his name, his financiers or his objectives. "


The writer :
Corinne Lepage

Lawyer, former Minister of the Environment, President of Cap21.


And another complete article about the weathered climategate: http://vert.courrierinternational.com/node/792607
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749




by sen-no-sen » 13/07/10, 17:55

The Allegre Foundation ... : Lol: , aiming to develop nuclear over-generators (because the future is the 4 generation according to him!) and GMOs ... no thanks!
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79287
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11024

Re: New IPCC report: we left for 1000 years!




by Christophe » 11/03/16, 15:54

Recall of the famous hockey stick curve (long controversial ...).
The latest weather records (2015, winter 2015-2016 ...) seem to confirm this kind of climate behavior ...

effect-of-strain curve-en-crosse de hockey pic83.jpg.png
effect-of-curved-greenhouse-in-hockey-stick-pic83.jpg.png (30.63 KIO) Accessed 2967 times


A "1900-2016" version would be welcome ... we are bad friends! : Cry:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 92 guests